Ann Li and Anastasija Sevastova will play each other in the 2nd round of the Melbourne Summer Set 2 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on Court 7. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ann Li who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ann Li is the pick to win this match.
Ann Li -> 1.55
Anastasija Sevastova -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ann Li vs. Anastasija Sevastova
There is no head to head record between Ann Li and Anastasija Sevastova since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ann Li
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-25 | 15-13 | 22-9 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-28 | 16-13 | 15-9 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-20 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-14 | 19-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-9 | 17-7 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 47 (career-high), the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Mayar Sherif 6-2 6-0.
In the 1st round, Ann had a good straight sets win against Sherif (6-2 6-0). During the match, Li scored 57 points vs Sherif’s 29. The American was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Li was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and she was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Ann Li was very effective on serve to win 78% (18/23) of her 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Li broke Sherif 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Li has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 64% of her matches (138-79). 1-0 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Li has an aggregate92-49 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Ann has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Melbourne
Anastasija Sevastova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-20 | 8-13 | 6-4 | 2-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 70, Anastasija reached the 2nd round after defeating Caroline Garcia 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Sevastova had a good straight sets win against Garcia (6-4 6-4). During the match Sevastova scored 67 points vs Garcia’s 57. The Latvian was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Sevastova bagged 6 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Anastasija Sevastova lost the serve once. Furthermore, Sevastova put 69% of her first serves in, winning 81% (34/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (7/19) on the 2nd serve. Sevastova broke Garcia 3 times after converting 33% of her break points (3/9).
The Latvian has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Melbourne
The Latvian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Li | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 20 |
| Pts | 57-29 | 67-57 |
| Total Points | 86 | 124 |
| Winners | 18 | 34 |
| %Winners | 32% | 51% |
Both Li and Sevastova played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Li and Sevastova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Li played 6 games less than Sevastova. Ann scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Latvian bagged 34 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Li | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
| 1st in | 23/42 | 42/61 |
| %1st in | 55% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 34/42 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 7/19 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 37% |
Li didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sevastova scored 6 aces . Li won 78% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Sevastova won 81% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Li | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 67% | 33% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The American broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Li dropped her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. Anastasija broke her opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Sevastova conceded her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Li | |||
| R1 Sherif |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 57-29 | 57-29 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 18/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sevastova | |||
| R1 Garcia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-57 | 67-57 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 34/42 | 34/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/19 | 7/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLWWWWL
LWWLWW Tennis Scores in Melbourne
- Gastao EliasElias – Juan Martin Del PotroMartin Del Potro (7-60 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Denis IstominIstomin (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas BerdychBerdych – Hyeon ChungChung (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Jordan ThompsonThompson (6-2 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gilles SimonSimon – Kyle EdmundEdmund (3-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga – Carlos BerlocqBerlocq (6-72 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Andreas SeppiSeppi (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Nick KyrgiosKyrgios (2-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Madison KeysKeys (0-7) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Claire LiuLiu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Lin ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-0) – H2H and prediction
