Duje Ajdukovic and Cezar Cretu (ROU) will play each other in the 2nd round of the Antalya 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 11. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Duje Ajdukovic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Duje Ajdukovic is the pick to win this match.
Duje Ajdukovic -> 1.25
Cezar Cretu (ROU) -> 3.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Duje Ajdukovic vs. Cezar Cretu (ROU)
This will be the 2nd time that Duje Ajdukovic and Cezar Cretu (ROU) square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Ajdukovic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Ajdukovic won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in the Iasi Challenger back in July 2021.
Duje Ajdukovic
Ranked no. 272, Duje reached the 2nd round after defeating Yshai Oliel 6-4 1-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Croatian defeated Oliel (6-4 1-6 6-4).During the match, Ajdukovic scored less points (10) than Oliel. In fact, the world no. 272 won 81 points vs Oliel’s. That means that Ajdukovic was more focused during the important points. The Croatian was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ajdukovic managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Duje Ajdukovic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ajdukovic put 57% of his first serves in, winning 62% (32/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (17/39) on the 2nd serve. Duje broke Oliel 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Ajdukovic has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (137-80). 28-22 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ajdukovic has an aggregate97-51 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
The Croatian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Napoli Challenger.
The Croatian has a composed 32-30 win-loss record in 2021, 28-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya 4 Challenger
Cezar Cretu (ROU)
Ranked no. 686 (career-high), the Romanian reached the 2nd round after defeating Yanki Erel 4-1 ret., Oleg Prihodko 6-2 6-4 and Khumoun Sultanov 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Romanian had a good straight sets win against Sultanov (6-3 6-3). During the match Cretu scored 69 points vs Sultanov’s 51. Cretu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Cretu scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Cezar Cretu (ROU) lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Cretu put 48% of his first serves in, winning 55% (17/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Cretu broke Sultanov 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
The Romanian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Pirot and M15 Antalya.
Cretu has an overall 41-18 win-loss record in 2021, 41-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ajdukovic | Cretu |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
Tot Games | 27 | 41 |
Pts | 81-91 | 157-116 |
Total Points | 172 | 273 |
Winners | 32 | 49 |
%Winners | 40% | 31% |
Ajdukovic played 1 match while Cretu competed in 3 matches. Cretu started his run from the qualifications while Ajdukovic had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Duje Ajdukovic lost 1 set while Cezar Cretu (ROU) hasn’t dropped a set so far. Ajdukovic has played 3 set(s) less than Cretu (3 vs 6). Therefore, Ajdukovic played 14 games less than Cretu. Duje scored 32 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian recorded 49 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ajdukovic | Cretu |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 4 |
Avg per match | 3 | 1.3 |
1st in | 52/91 | 77/148 |
%1st in | 57% | 52% |
1st pts | 32/52 | 49/77 |
%1st pts | 62% | 64% |
2nd pts | 17/39 | 38/71 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 54% |
Ajdukovic blasted 3 aces . Cretu scored 4 aces (1.3 per match). Ajdukovic won 62% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Cretu won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ajdukovic | Cretu |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 12 |
Converted | 5/8 | 12/20 |
% Converted | 63% | 60% |
Conceded | 10 | 14 |
Saved | 5 | 9 |
% Saved | 50% | 64% |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Croatian lost his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Romanian broke his opponents 12 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
Ajdukovic | |||
R1 Oliel |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 81-91 | 81-91 | |
Total points | 172 | 172 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 52/91 | 52/91 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 32/52 | 32/52 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 17/39 | 17/39 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Cretu | |||||
Q1 Erel |
Q3 Prihodko |
R1 Sultanov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-1 ret. | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 5 | 18 | 18 | 41 | |
pts | 21-13 | 67-52 | 69-51 | 157-116 | |
Total points | 34 | 119 | 120 | 273 | |
Winners | 8 | 24 | 17 | 49 | |
%Winners | 38% | 36% | 25% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
1st in | 13/22 | 33/62 | 31/64 | 77/148 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 53% | 48% | 52% | |
1st pts | 8/13 | 24/33 | 17/31 | 49/77 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 73% | 55% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 7/9 | 12/29 | 19/33 | 38/71 | |
% 2nd pts | 78% | 41% | 58% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 1 | 5 | 6 | 12 | |
Converted | 1/1 | 5/9 | 6/10 | 12/20 | |
Converted % | 100% | 56% | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 2 | 7 | 5 | 14 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/7 | 2/5 | 9 | |
Saved % | 100% | 71% | 40% | 211% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Antalya 4 Challenger
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Sarp AgabigunAgabigun (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Nick ChappellChappell (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Damien WengerWenger (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Jakub PaulPaul (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Yshai OlielOliel (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-60 7-60) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-615 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Marsel IlhanIlhan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (2-6 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-6(0) 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Marsel IlhanIlhan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duckhee LeeLee – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction