Facundo Bagnis and Francisco Comesana will square off in the 2nd round of the Montevideo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Bagnis who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Bagnis is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Bagnis -> 1.22
Francisco Comesana -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Bagnis vs. Francisco Comesana
There is no head to head record between Facundo Bagnis and Francisco Comesana since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Facundo Bagnis
Ranked no. 78, Bagnis reached the 2nd round after defeating Gonzalo Villanueva 6-1 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Villanueva (6-1 7-64). During the match, Bagnis scored 87 points vs Villanueva’s 67. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bagnis recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Facundo Bagnis lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Bagnis put 65% of his first serves in, winning 66% (33/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (18/27) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Villanueva 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Bagnis has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (368-248). 34-15 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bagnis has an overall 348-210 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title in the Anif Challenger where he beat Federico Coria in the final 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Bagnis has an overall 37-22 win-loss record in 2021, 34-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montevideo Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2011, 2017 and 2019. See his history.
Francisco Comesana
Ranked no. 523, Francisco reached the 2nd round after defeating Juan Martin Fumeaux 6-2 6-4, Nicolas Alvarez Varona 6-4 6-1 and Facundo Juarez 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Francisco had a good straight sets win against Juarez (6-4 7-5). During the match Comesana scored 67 points vs Juarez’s 63. Francisco was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Comesana blasted 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Francisco Comesana was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Francisco broke Juarez 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Francisco’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Sofia,M25 Kottingbrunn and M15 Novi Sad.
Comesana has a composed 37-12 win-loss record in 2021, 37-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bagnis | Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 57 |
| Pts | 87-67 | 200-162 |
| Total Points | 154 | 362 |
| Winners | 33 | 79 |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% |
Bagnis played 1 match while Comesana competed in 3 matches. Comesana started his run from the qualifications while Bagnis had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Bagnis has played 4 set(s) less than Comesana (2 vs 6). Therefore, Bagnis played 37 games less than Comesana. Facundo scored 33 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Comesana made 79 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bagnis | Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 110/174 |
| %1st in | 65% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 79/110 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 34/64 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 53% |
Bagnis recorded 2 aces . Comesana made 7 aces (2.3 per match). Bagnis won 66% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Comesana won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bagnis | Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/10 | 13/31 |
| % Converted | 30% | 42% |
| Conceded | 6 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 4 |
| % Saved | 83% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Facundo lost his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Comesana broke his opponents 13 times with a 42% conversion rate. Francisco conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bagnis | |||
| R1 Villanueva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 87-67 | 87-67 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 50/77 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Comesana | |||||
| Q1 Martin |
Q3 Alvarez |
R1 Juarez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 22 | 57 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 65-45 | 67-63 | 200-162 | |
| Total points | 122 | 110 | 130 | 362 | |
| Winners | 24 | 29 | 26 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 45% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 40/54 | 36/63 | 110/174 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 74% | 57% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 29/40 | 26/36 | 79/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 73% | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 7/14 | 17/27 | 34/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 50% | 63% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/9 | 3/10 | 13/31 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 56% | 30% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 3/4 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 75% | 0% | 108% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWWLW
LLWWLWLWLW Tennis Scores in Montevideo Challenger
- Federico CoriaCoria – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-0 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (3-6 7-64 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (4-6 6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Hugo DellienDellien (0-0) – H2H and prediction
