Tallon Griekspoor and Danylo Kalenichenko will play each other in the 2nd round of the Bratislava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.081
Danylo Kalenichenko -> 7.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Danylo Kalenichenko
There is no head to head record between Tallon Griekspoor and Danylo Kalenichenko since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tallon Griekspoor
Ranked no. 72 (career-high), the Dutch reached the 2nd round after beating Lukas Pokorny 7-64 6-1.
In the 1st round, Griekspoor had a good straight sets win against Pokorny (7-64 6-1). During the match, Griekspoor scored 73 points vs Pokorny’s 50. Griekspoor was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Griekspoor managed to score 7 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tallon Griekspoor was very efficient on serve to win 80% (37/46) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Griekspoor was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Pokorny 3 times.
Griekspoor has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (271-142). 5-3 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Griekspoor has a compiled35-28 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in the Prague Challenger where he overcame Oscar Otte in the final 5-7 6-4 6-4 and in the Bratislava Challenger where he overcame Sebastian Baez in the final 7-6(6) 6-3 and in the Amersfoort Challenger where he overcame Botic Van De Zandschulp in the final 6-1 3-6 6-1 and in the Murcia Challenger where he defeated Roberto Carballes Baena in the final 3-6 7-5 6-3 and in the Napoli Challenger where he defeated Andrea Pellegrino in the final 6-3 6-2 and in the Napoli 2 Challenger where he overcame Alexander Ritschard in the final 6-3 6-2 and in the Tenerife Challenger where he overcame Feliciano Lopez in the final 6-4 6-4.
Griekspoor has an aggregate 55-17 win-loss record in 2021, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Danylo Kalenichenko
Ranked no. 510, the Ukrainian reached the 2nd round after defeating Uladzimir Ignatik 7-68 6-4, Martin Krumich 6-2 6-2 and Lukas Palovic 7-64 7-65.
In the 1st round, Danylo had a good straight sets win against Palovic (7-64 7-65). During the match Kalenichenko scored 93 points vs Palovic’s 79. Danylo was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Kalenichenko struck 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Danylo Kalenichenko lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kalenichenko put 74% of his first serves in, winning 89% (48/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Danylo broke Palovic once after converting 13% of his break points (1/8).
Danylo’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Novomoskovsk and M15 Bratislava.
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 20-16 win-loss record in 2021, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 65 |
| Pts | 73-50 | 225-189 |
| Total Points | 123 | 414 |
| Winners | 37 | 110 |
| %Winners | 51% | 49% |
Griekspoor played 1 match while Kalenichenko competed in 3 matches. Kalenichenko started his run from the qualifications while Griekspoor had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Griekspoor has played 4 set(s) less than Kalenichenko (2 vs 6). Therefore, Griekspoor played 45 games less than Kalenichenko. Griekspoor scored 37 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian recorded 110 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 138/200 |
| %1st in | 70% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 110/138 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 35/62 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 56% |
Griekspoor scored 7 aces . Kalenichenko scored 23 aces (7.7 per match). Griekspoor won 80% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Kalenichenko won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 7 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 7/19 |
| % Converted | 100% | 37% |
| Conceded | 2 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Kalenichenko broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Danylo conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | |||
| R1 Pokorny |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-50 | 73-50 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 46/66 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 37/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kalenichenko | |||||
| Q1 Ignatik |
Q3 Krumich |
R1 Palovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 16 | 26 | 65 | |
| pts | 69-72 | 63-38 | 93-79 | 225-189 | |
| Total points | 141 | 101 | 172 | 414 | |
| Winners | 36 | 26 | 48 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 41% | 52% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 7 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 52/79 | 32/48 | 54/73 | 138/200 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 67% | 74% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 36/52 | 26/32 | 48/54 | 110/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 81% | 89% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 9/16 | 9/19 | 35/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 47% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 4/9 | 1/8 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 44% | 13% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 2/2 | 3/4 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 100% | 75% | 261% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLWWW
Tennis Scores in Bratislava Challenger
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Liam BroadyBroady (6-4 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Danylo KalenichenkoKalenichenko – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
