Rebecca Peterson and Lesya Tsurenko will square off in the quarter of the Transylvania Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:00 pm on Center Court. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rebecca Peterson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rebecca Peterson is the pick to win this match.
Rebecca Peterson -> 1.727
Lesya Tsurenko -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rebecca Peterson vs. Lesya Tsurenko
This will be the 4th time that Rebecca Peterson and Lesya Tsurenko fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Peterson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Peterson won 7-6(6) 6-4 in the 2nd round in Eastbourne back in 2019.
Rebecca Peterson
Ranked no. 99, Peterson reached the quarter after beating Jana Fett 6-1 6-3 and Irina Maria Bara 6-0 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Rebecca had a good straight sets win against Maria Bara (6-0 6-3). During the match, Peterson scored 61 points vs Maria Bara’s 39. Peterson was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Peterson struck 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Rebecca Peterson was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (27/33) of her 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Rebecca broke Maria Bara 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Peterson started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 61% of the points she played.
Peterson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (292-167). 5-2 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Peterson has a compiled 37-15 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in the W60 Rancho Santa Fe where she beat Elvina Kalieva in the final 6-4 6-0.
The Swede has a compiled 27-20 win-loss record in 2021, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cluj-Napoca
Rebecca has never competed in this tournament before.
Lesya Tsurenko
Ranked no. 127, Tsurenko reached the quarter after beating Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers 7-63 6-3, Andreea Rosca 7-5 6-1, Andreea Prisacariu 7-5 6-2 and Anastasia Gasanova 6-2 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Gasanova (6-2 7-5). During the match Tsurenko scored 84 points vs Gasanova’s 66. Tsurenko was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Tsurenko wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Lesya Tsurenko lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Tsurenko put 62% of her first serves in, winning 62% (23/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the 2nd serve. Lesya broke Gasanova 5 times after converting 24% of her break points (5/21).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points she played.
Lesya has an aggregate 26-14 win-loss record in 2021, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Peterson | Tsurenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 81 |
| Pts | 120-77 | 298-224 |
| Total Points | 197 | 522 |
| Winners | 50 | 109 |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% |
Peterson played 2 matches while Tsurenko competed in 4 matches. Tsurenko started her run from the qualifications while Peterson had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Peterson has played 4 set(s) less than Tsurenko (4 vs 8). Therefore, Peterson played 50 games less than Tsurenko. Peterson scored 50 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Tsurenko fired 109 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Peterson | Tsurenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0.5 |
| 1st in | 63/92 | 171/256 |
| %1st in | 68% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 50/63 | 109/171 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 38/85 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 45% |
Peterson recorded 10 aces (5 per match). Tsurenko fired 2 aces (0.5 per match). Peterson won 79% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Tsurenko won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Peterson | Tsurenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 25 |
| Converted | 9/21 | 25/47 |
| % Converted | 43% | 53% |
| Conceded | 3 | 27 |
| Saved | 2 | 12 |
| % Saved | 67% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 15 |
Rebecca broke her opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Rebecca lost her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Ukrainian broke her opponents 25 times with a 53% conversion rate. Lesya conceded her serve 15 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded.
| Peterson | ||||
| R1 Fett |
R2 Maria Bara |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
| pts | 59-38 | 61-39 | 120-77 | |
| Total points | 97 | 100 | 197 | |
| Winners | 23 | 27 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 44% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 30/43 | 33/49 | 63/92 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 67% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 27/33 | 50/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 82% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 9/16 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 56% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 4/10 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 40% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tsurenko | ||||||
| Q1 Cavalle-Reimers |
Q3 Amalia Rosca |
R1 Prisacariu |
R2 Gasanova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | 7-5 6-1 | 7-5 6-2 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 81 | |
| pts | 76-57 | 72-51 | 66-50 | 84-66 | 298-224 | |
| Total points | 133 | 123 | 116 | 150 | 522 | |
| Winners | 31 | 29 | 26 | 23 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% | 39% | 27% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 46/65 | 42/60 | 37/60 | 171/256 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 71% | 70% | 62% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/46 | 29/46 | 26/42 | 23/37 | 109/171 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 63% | 62% | 62% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 6/19 | 5/18 | 16/23 | 38/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 32% | 28% | 70% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 25 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 7/8 | 8/13 | 5/21 | 25/47 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 88% | 62% | 24% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 27 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 3/7 | 3/8 | 2/4 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 43% | 38% | 50% | 91% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 15 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLWWLWL
LLWWWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Cluj
- David GuezGuez – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (1-6 7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandre MullerMuller – John LambleLamble (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Simona HalepHalep – Jaqueline CristianCristian (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Anett KontaveitKontaveit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
