![Prediction And Head To Head Quentin Halys Vs. Jonas Forejtek Nbahhlksur Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Jonas Forejtek](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Quentin-Halys-vs.-Jonas-Forejtek-nBAHhlkSUR.jpg)
Quentin Halys and Jonas Forejtek will fight against each other in the quarter of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.5
Jonas Forejtek -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Jonas Forejtek
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Jonas Forejtek since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Quentin Halys
Ranked no. 148, the French player reached the quarter after beating Daniel Masur 6-4 5-7 6-3 and Ruben Bemelmans 7-68 6-75 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The French player defeated Bemelmans (7-68 6-75 6-4). During the match, Halys scored 121 points vs Bemelmans’s 116. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 61 winners.
Talking about the service games, Halys buried his opponent with 33 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Quentin Halys lost the serve once and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Halys put 64% of his first serves in, winning 81% (61/75) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Bemelmans twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Quentin started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this event to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Halys has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (274-230). 2-0 on carpet in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Halys has a composed 10-8 match record in the last years on carpet.
The French player best result of the year was reaching the final in the Forli Challenger and the Porto Challenger.
The French player has a compiled 32-24 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2019. See his history.
Jonas Forejtek
Ranked no. 310 (career-high), the Czech reached the quarter after defeating Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-4 7-61, Evan Furness 6-4 6-4, Jordan Thompson 5-7 6-2 6-2 and Yannick Maden 7-63 3-6 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Czech defeated Maden (7-63 3-6 6-1). During the match Forejtek scored 94 points vs Maden’s 83. The Czech was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Forejtek managed to score 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jonas Forejtek lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Forejtek put 75% of his first serves in, winning 67% (43/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the 2nd serve. The Czech was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Maden 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Forejtek’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Prague 2 Challenger.
Forejtek has a composed 30-26 win-loss record in 2021, 4-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Halys | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 6 | 10 |
Tot Games | 67 | 100 |
Pts | 238-220 | 331-280 |
Total Points | 458 | 611 |
Winners | 105 | 152 |
%Winners | 44% | 46% |
Halys played 2 matches while Forejtek competed in 4 matches. Forejtek started his run from the qualifications while Halys had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Quentin Halys surrendered 2 sets, while Jonas Forejtek dropped 2 sets. Halys has played 4 set(s) less than Forejtek (6 vs 10). Therefore, Halys played 33 games less than Forejtek. Halys scored 105 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Forejtek struck 152 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Halys | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Aces | 57 | 38 |
Avg per match | 28.5 | 9.5 |
1st in | 133/225 | 199/300 |
%1st in | 59% | 66% |
1st pts | 105/133 | 152/199 |
%1st pts | 79% | 76% |
2nd pts | 46/92 | 59/101 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Halys struck 57 aces (28.5 per match). Forejtek fired 38 aces (9.5 per match). Halys won 79% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Forejtek won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Halys | Forejtek |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 12 |
Converted | 6/19 | 12/18 |
% Converted | 32% | 67% |
Conceded | 24 | 19 |
Saved | 21 | 14 |
% Saved | 88% | 74% |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Quentin broke his opponents 6 times with a 32% conversion rate. Halys surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Jonas broke his opponents 12 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded.
Halys | ||||
R1 Masur |
R2 Bemelmans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | 7-68 6-75 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 36 | 67 | |
pts | 117-104 | 121-116 | 238-220 | |
Total points | 221 | 237 | 458 | |
Winners | 44 | 61 | 105 | |
%Winners | 38% | 50% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 24 | 33 | 57 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
1st in | 58/107 | 75/118 | 133/225 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 64% | 59% | |
1st pts | 44/58 | 61/75 | 105/133 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 81% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 25/49 | 21/43 | 46/92 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 49% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Converted | 4/15 | 2/4 | 6/19 | |
Converted % | 27% | 50% | 32% | |
Conceded | 11 | 13 | 24 | |
Saved | 9/11 | 12/13 | 21 | |
Saved % | 82% | 92% | 87% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Forejtek | ||||||
Q1 Ramanathan |
Q3 Furness |
R1 Thompson |
R2 Maden |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-61 | 6-4 6-4 | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | 7-63 3-6 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 28 | 29 | 100 | |
pts | 68-56 | 63-46 | 106-95 | 94-83 | 331-280 | |
Total points | 124 | 109 | 201 | 177 | 611 | |
Winners | 34 | 28 | 47 | 43 | 152 | |
%Winners | 50% | 44% | 44% | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 8 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 38 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
1st in | 36/60 | 33/53 | 66/102 | 64/85 | 199/300 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 62% | 65% | 75% | 66% | |
1st pts | 34/36 | 28/33 | 47/66 | 43/64 | 152/199 | |
% 1st pts | 94% | 85% | 71% | 67% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 12/24 | 14/20 | 18/36 | 15/21 | 59/101 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 70% | 50% | 71% | 58% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/2 | 5/10 | 3/3 | 12/18 | |
Converted % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 100% | 67% | |
Conceded | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 19 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 10/12 | 3/5 | 14 | |
Saved % | 50% | – | 83% | 60% | 97% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Lukas LackoLacko (2-6) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Maximilian MartererMarterer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Kacper ZukZuk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction