Madison Brengle and Louisa Chirico will play each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus WTA 125 for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on Court 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Madison Brengle who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Madison Brengle is the pick to win this match.
Madison Brengle -> 1.33
Louisa Chirico -> 3.44
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Madison Brengle vs. Louisa Chirico
This will be the 4th time that Madison Brengle and Louisa Chirico play each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Chirico (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Chirico won 6-4 1-6 6-4 in the quarter in the Albuquerque back in 1970.
Madison Brengle
Ranked no. 90, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Danielle Lao 6-1 4-0 ret..
In the 1st round, Brengle had a good straight sets win against Lao (6-1 4-0 ret.). During the match, Brengle scored 51 points vs Lao’s 25. The American was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brengle scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Madison Brengle was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (17/23) of her 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Madison broke Lao 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Brengle has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 58% of her matches (329-239). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brengle has a composed 30-25 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Brengle’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the W100 Charleston.
Brengle has an overall 20-20 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus
Brengle has never competed in this tournament before.
Louisa Chirico
Ranked no. 432, Louisa reached the 2nd round after beating Alycia Parks 6-74 6-1 7-64, Ulrikke Eikeri 6-2 5-7 6-3 and Maddison Inglis 6-3 1-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Inglis (6-3 1-6 6-2). During the match Chirico and Inglis scored the same amount of points (74). However, the world no. 90 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Louisa was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Chirico bagged 10 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Louisa Chirico lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Chirico put 61% of her first serves in, winning 77% (33/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 26% (7/27) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Inglis 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Chirico has an overall 6-8 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brengle | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 11 | 86 |
| Pts | 51-25 | 292-265 |
| Total Points | 76 | 557 |
| Winners | 17 | 117 |
| %Winners | 33% | 40% |
Brengle played 1 match while Chirico competed in 3 matches. Chirico started her run from the qualifications while Brengle had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Louisa Chirico lost 3 sets while Madison Brengle hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Brengle has played 6 set(s) less than Chirico (3 vs 9). Therefore, Brengle played 75 games less than Chirico. The American scored 17 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 117 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brengle | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 23/35 | 166/266 |
| %1st in | 66% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 117/166 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 45/100 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 45% |
Brengle scored 1 ace . Chirico also managed to score 12 aces (4 per match). Brengle won 74% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Chirico won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brengle | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 16 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 16/41 |
| % Converted | 83% | 39% |
| Conceded | 3 | 18 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Brengle surrendered her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponents 16 times with a 39% conversion rate. Chirico conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded.
| Brengle | |||
| R1 Lao |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 11 | |
| pts | 51-25 | 51-25 | |
| Total points | 76 | 76 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Chirico | |||||
| Q1 Parks |
Q3 Eikeri |
R1 Inglis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-1 7-64 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 29 | 24 | 86 | |
| pts | 113-99 | 105-92 | 74-74 | 292-265 | |
| Total points | 212 | 197 | 148 | 557 | |
| Winners | 46 | 38 | 33 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 67/105 | 56/91 | 43/70 | 166/266 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 62% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 46/67 | 38/56 | 33/43 | 117/166 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 68% | 77% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 18/35 | 7/27 | 45/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 51% | 26% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 6/14 | 5/12 | 16/41 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 43% | 42% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 6/9 | 1/5 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 67% | 20% | 112% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Columbus
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lauren DavisDavis – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-2 7-66) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ann LiLi – Harriet DartDart (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeremy JahnJahn – Alexander VasilenkoVasilenko (4-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Louisa ChiricoChirico (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexa GlatchGlatch – Saisai ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
