![Prediction And Head To Head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune Vs. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Hzjbxljur5 Prediction and head to head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune vs. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Holger-Vitus-Nodskov-Rune-vs.-Matheus-Pucinelli-De-Almeida-HZJBxlJuR5.jpg)
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune is the pick to win this match.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune -> 1.37
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune vs. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
There is no head to head record between Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune
Ranked no. 162 (career-high), Holger got to the 2nd round after beating Matija Pecotic 6-2 7-63.
In the 1st round, Holger had a good straight sets win against Pecotic (6-2 7-63). During the match, Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 81 points vs Pecotic’s 66. Vitus Nodskov Rune was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vitus Nodskov Rune recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (37/43) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Holger broke Pecotic twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Vitus Nodskov Rune has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 67% of his matches (87-43). 35-15 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Vitus Nodskov Rune has an aggregate68-32 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Holger’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Manacor,M15+H Bressuire,M25 Villena,the Oeiras 4 Challenger,the Biella 7 Challenger and the San Marino Challenger.
The Dane has a composed 48-17 win-loss record in 2021, 35-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Holger has never competed in this tournament before.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Ranked no. 342, the Brazilian reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolas Alvarez 6-2 6-1, Thiago Agustin Tirante 6-3 3-6 7-5 and Malek Jaziri 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Pucinelli De Almeida had a good straight sets win against Jaziri (6-4 6-1). During the match Pucinelli De Almeida scored 67 points vs Jaziri’s 45. Matheus was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Pucinelli De Almeida scored 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (27/36) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Matheus broke Jaziri 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Pucinelli De Almeida’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Cairo,M25 Kiseljak and M15 Sarajevo.
Pucinelli De Almeida has an aggregate 60-16 win-loss record in 2021, 60-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 21 | 62 |
Pts | 81-66 | 217-162 |
Total Points | 147 | 379 |
Winners | 37 | 74 |
%Winners | 46% | 34% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune played 1 match while Pucinelli De Almeida competed in 3 matches. Pucinelli De Almeida started his run from the qualifications while Vitus Nodskov Rune had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida conceded 1 set while Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Vitus Nodskov Rune has played 5 set(s) less than Pucinelli De Almeida (2 vs 7). Therefore, Vitus Nodskov Rune played 41 games less than Pucinelli De Almeida. The Dane scored 37 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Matheus blasted 74 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 4 |
Avg per match | 4 | 1.3 |
1st in | 43/59 | 102/163 |
%1st in | 73% | 63% |
1st pts | 37/43 | 74/102 |
%1st pts | 86% | 73% |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 40/61 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 66% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune blasted 4 aces . Pucinelli De Almeida blasted 4 aces (1.3 per match). Vitus Nodskov Rune won 86% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pucinelli De Almeida won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Pucinelli De Almeida |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 14 |
Converted | 2/9 | 14/29 |
% Converted | 22% | 48% |
Conceded | 2 | 9 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 44% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Vitus Nodskov Rune broke his opponent twice with a 22% conversion rate. Vitus Nodskov Rune had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Brazilian broke his opponents 14 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Brazilian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
Vitus Nodskov Rune | |||
R1 Pecotic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 81-66 | 81-66 | |
Total points | 147 | 147 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 43/59 | 43/59 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 37/43 | 37/43 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/9 | 2/9 | |
Converted % | 22% | 22% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Pucinelli De Almeida | |||||
Q1 Alvarez |
Q3 Agustin Tirante |
R1 Jaziri |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 30 | 17 | 62 | |
pts | 57-31 | 93-86 | 67-45 | 217-162 | |
Total points | 88 | 179 | 112 | 379 | |
Winners | 15 | 32 | 27 | 74 | |
%Winners | 26% | 34% | 40% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 21/37 | 45/75 | 36/51 | 102/163 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 60% | 71% | 63% | |
1st pts | 15/21 | 32/45 | 27/36 | 74/102 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | 75% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 23/30 | 8/15 | 40/61 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 77% | 53% | 66% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 7 | 3 | 4 | 14 | |
Converted | 7/11 | 3/11 | 4/7 | 14/29 | |
Converted % | 64% | 27% | 57% | 48% | |
Conceded | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 4 | |
Saved % | 33% | 50% | 50% | 133% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-4 6-74 7-66) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-3 7-60) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Marco BortolottiBortolotti (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Matteo ViolaViola (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (6-73 6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gabriel Roveri Sidney/Marcelo ZormannRoveri Sidney/Marcelo Zormann – Nicolo Pozzani/Alessio ZanottiPozzani/Alessio Zanotti (7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Orlando LuzLuz (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Paolo LorenziLorenzi – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Francesco FortiForti – Fletcher ScottScott (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (1-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Filippo BaldiBaldi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Pavel KotovKotov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction