Emilio Nava and Danylo Kalenichenko will face off in the qualifications of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.182
Danylo Kalenichenko -> 4.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Danylo Kalenichenko
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Danylo Kalenichenko since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
Ranked no. 391, Nava reached the qualifications after beating Marek Gengel 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Nava had a good straight sets win against Gengel (6-4 6-3). During the match, Nava scored 72 points vs Gengel’s 62. Nava was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 69% of his first serves in, winning 63% (31/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Gengel 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Nava has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 66% of his matches (74-38). 20-3 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has a composed29-11 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 La Nucia and M25 Reus.
The American has an overall 29-7 win-loss record in 2021, 20-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Nava has never competed in this tournament before.
Danylo Kalenichenko
Ranked no. 526, Kalenichenko reached the qualifications after defeating Kyrian Jacquet 7-66 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Jacquet (7-66 6-4). During the match Kalenichenko scored 75 points vs Jacquet’s 73. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Kalenichenko struck 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Danylo Kalenichenko was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kalenichenko broke Jacquet twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Kalenichenko’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Novomoskovsk.
Danylo has a composed 11-10 win-loss record in 2021, 6-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 23 |
| Pts | 72-62 | 75-73 |
| Total Points | 134 | 148 |
| Winners | 31 | 30 |
| %Winners | 43% | 40% |
Both Nava and Kalenichenko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nava and Kalenichenko have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nava played 4 games less than Kalenichenko. Emilio scored 31 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Danylo managed to score 30 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 49/71 | 39/70 |
| %1st in | 69% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 31/49 | 30/39 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 17/31 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 55% |
Nava bagged 1 ace . Kalenichenko also struck 3 aces . Nava won 63% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Kalenichenko won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 36% | 29% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Emilio broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Emilio dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Ukrainian broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Gengel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 72-62 | 72-62 | |
| Total points | 134 | 134 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 49/71 | 49/71 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/49 | 31/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 11/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kalenichenko | |||
| Q1 Jacquet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 75-73 | 75-73 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/70 | 39/70 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Mischa ZverevZverev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Danylo KalenichenkoKalenichenko – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Carlos Gomez-HerreraGomez-Herrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Martin KrumichKrumich (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Jc AragoneAragone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
