Na-Lae Han and Ashlyn Krueger will play each other in the qualifications of the Mubadala Silicon Valley Classic for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:00 pm on Stadium. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Na-Lae Han who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Na-Lae Han is the pick to win this match.
Na-Lae Han -> 1.53
Ashlyn Krueger -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Na-Lae Han vs. Ashlyn Krueger
There is no head to head record between Na-Lae Han and Ashlyn Krueger since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Na-Lae Han
Ranked no. 266,she will start her run in San Jose after she played her last match in San Jose where she defeated 6-3 2-6 6-0 to Ahn in the qualifications on the 31st of July.
Han has an overall 14-21 win-loss record in 2021, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
The Korean’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the W25 Dubai.
Talking about her overall career, The Korean has an overall 216-150 record. She has a positive 203-125 record on hard.
Previously in San Jose
Han has never competed in this tournament before.
Ashlyn Krueger
Ranked no. 734, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Valeria Savinykh 6-1 7-62.
In the qualifications, Ashlyn had a good straight sets win against Savinykh (6-1 7-62). During the match Krueger scored 72 points vs Savinykh’s 60. Krueger was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Krueger managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve once and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 66% of her first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the 2nd serve. Krueger broke Savinykh 3 times after converting 60% of her break points (3/5).
Ashlyn has an aggregate 11-8 win-loss record in 2021, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Han | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 |
| Pts | 79-65 | 72-60 |
| Total Points | 144 | 132 |
| Winners | 34 | 31 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Han and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Na-Lae Han surrendered 1 set while Ashlyn Krueger hasn’t conceded a set so far. Han has played 1 set more than Krueger (3 vs 2). Therefore, Han played 3 games more than Krueger. The Korean scored 34 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 31 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Han | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 50/79 | 47/71 |
| %1st in | 63% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 31/47 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 15/24 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 63% |
Han scored 2 aces . Krueger made 2 aces . Han won 68% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Han | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 71% | 60% |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 57% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Han broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Na-Lae surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. Ashlyn broke her opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Han | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | – | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | NAN% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Savinykh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-60 | 72-60 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/71 | 47/71 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 31/47 | 31/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | INF% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LW
WLWLWWLWWW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Na-Lae HanHan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emina BektasBektas – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Donna VekicVekic – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Petra MarticMartic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Shuai ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Shelby RogersRogers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alison RiskeRiske – Sloane StephensStephens (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Claire LiuLiu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
