Sumit Nagal and Marvin Moeller will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on ÖFFENTLICHE CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.131
Marvin Moeller -> 5.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Marvin Moeller
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Marvin Moeller since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
Ranked no. 150, the Indian reached the 2nd round after defeating Mohamed Safwat 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Safwat (6-3 7-63). During the match, Nagal scored 84 points vs Safwat’s 78. Sumit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nagal wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 82% of his first serves in, winning 64% (46/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Safwat twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Nagal has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (233-139). 17-12 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagal has a composed157-78 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Indian has an aggregate 17-14 win-loss record in 2021, 17-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2016. See his history.
Marvin Moeller
Ranked no. 613, Marvin reached the 2nd round after defeating Teimuraz Gabashvili 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Marvin had a good straight sets win against Gabashvili (7-5 6-3). During the match Moeller scored 80 points vs Gabashvili’s 73. Moeller was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Moeller scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Marvin Moeller lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Moeller put 64% of his first serves in, winning 62% (29/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Moeller broke Gabashvili 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Moeller has a composed 10-12 win-loss record in 2021, 6-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Moeller |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 21 |
| Pts | 84-78 | 80-73 |
| Total Points | 162 | 153 |
| Winners | 46 | 29 |
| %Winners | 55% | 36% |
Both Nagal and Moeller played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nagal and Moeller have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nagal played 1 game more than Moeller. The Indian scored 46 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, The German struck 29 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Moeller |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 72/88 | 47/73 |
| %1st in | 82% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 46/72 | 29/47 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 14/26 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 54% |
Nagal didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Moeller bagged 1 ace . Nagal won 64% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Moeller won 62% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Moeller |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 29% | 42% |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 86% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Sumit broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Nagal surrendered his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Moeller broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Marvin conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Safwat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 84-78 | 84-78 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 72/88 | 72/88 | |
| % 1st in | 82% | 82% | |
| 1st pts | 46/72 | 46/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Moeller | |||
| R1 Gabashvili |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 80-73 | 80-73 | |
| Total points | 153 | 153 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 47/73 | 47/73 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLLLL
LWWWWWWWLW Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Benoit PairePaire – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Dayne KellyKelly (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sandro EhratEhrat – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Filip HoranskyHoransky (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Steven DiezDiez (7-5 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-4 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-2 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Malek JaziriJaziri (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro EhratEhrat – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Tomas MachacMachac (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
