Sam Querrey and James Duckworth will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Mercedes Cup for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on MERCEDES COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sam Querrey who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sam Querrey is the pick to win this match.
Sam Querrey -> 1.54
James Duckworth -> 2.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sam Querrey vs. James Duckworth
There is no head to head record between Sam Querrey and James Duckworth since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sam Querrey
Ranked no. 67, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Altug Celikbilek 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Sam had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (6-4 6-1). During the match, Querrey scored 58 points vs Celikbilek’s 41. Querrey was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Querrey blasted 13 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Sam Querrey was exceptionally effective on serve to win 95% (18/19) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Querrey broke Celikbilek 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Querrey has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (263-194). 1-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Querrey has an aggregate 48-25 match record in the last years on grass.
Querrey has an aggregate 3-6 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stuttgart
Querrey has never competed in this tournament before.
James Duckworth
Ranked no. 101, the Australian got to the 2nd round after beating Luke Saville 6-76 6-4 6-4, Ilya Ivashka 7-65 3-6 7-5 and Adrian Mannarino 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, James had a good straight sets win against Mannarino (6-3 6-2). During the match Duckworth scored 57 points vs Mannarino’s 38. James was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Duckworth bagged 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. James Duckworth was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 79% (15/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mannarino 3 times.
James has an aggregate 11-9 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Querrey | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 84 |
| Pts | 58-41 | 275-258 |
| Total Points | 99 | 533 |
| Winners | 18 | 116 |
| %Winners | 31% | 42% |
Querrey played 1 match while Duckworth competed in 3 matches. Duckworth started his run from the qualifications while Querrey had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, James Duckworth dropped 2 sets while Sam Querrey hasn’t dropped a set so far. Querrey has played 6 set(s) less than Duckworth (2 vs 8). Therefore, Querrey played 67 games less than Duckworth. Sam scored 18 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian managed to score 116 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Querrey | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 8 |
| 1st in | 19/43 | 152/270 |
| %1st in | 44% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 116/152 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 71/118 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 60% |
Querrey scored 13 aces . Duckworth blasted 24 aces (8 per match). Querrey won 95% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Duckworth won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Querrey | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 7/19 |
| % Converted | 44% | 37% |
| Conceded | 0 | 16 |
| Saved | 0 | 14 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Sam broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Duckworth broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Querrey | |||
| R1 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 19/43 | 19/43 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Duckworth | |||||
| Q1 Saville |
Q3 Ivashka |
R1 Mannarino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 6-4 6-4 | 7-65 3-6 7-5 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 34 | 17 | 84 | |
| pts | 114-107 | 104-113 | 57-38 | 275-258 | |
| Total points | 221 | 217 | 95 | 533 | |
| Winners | 51 | 41 | 24 | 116 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | 7 | 5 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 62/113 | 57/105 | 33/52 | 152/270 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 54% | 63% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 51/62 | 41/57 | 24/33 | 116/152 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 72% | 73% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/51 | 28/48 | 15/19 | 71/118 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 58% | 79% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 50% | 100% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 4 | 16 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 3/5 | 4/4 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | 100% | 260% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Stuttgart
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Radu AlbotAlbot (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (5-7 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jeremy ChardyChardy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (2-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Feliciano LopezLopez – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Guido PellaPella (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Gilles SimonSimon (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Dustin BrownBrown (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Feliciano LopezLopez – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Sam QuerreyQuerrey (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Feliciano LopezLopez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jordan ThompsonThompson (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
