Denis Kudla and Liam Broady will square off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Kudla who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Kudla is the pick to win this match.
Denis Kudla -> 1.57
Liam Broady -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Kudla vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 4th time that Denis Kudla and Liam Broady face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Kudla (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Kudla won 6-2 6-3 in the 1st round in the Dallas Challenger back in 2015.
Denis Kudla
Ranked no. 120, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Machac 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kudla defeated Machac (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match, Kudla scored 93 points vs Machac’s 83. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kudla recorded 14 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Denis Kudla was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (36/49) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Denis broke Machac 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Kudla has a good record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (336-252). 1-0 on grass in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kudla has a compiled 55-35 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Kudla’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Orlando Challenger.
Kudla has a composed 14-12 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2014. See his history.
Liam Broady
Ranked no. 146, the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Alex Bolt 7-5 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Liam defeated Bolt (7-5 3-6 6-3). During the match Broady scored 89 points vs Bolt’s 80. Broady was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Liam Broady lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Broady put 69% of his first serves in, winning 74% (45/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Broady broke Bolt 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Broady’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger and the Biella 3 Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 23-10 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kudla | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 30 |
| Pts | 93-83 | 89-80 |
| Total Points | 176 | 169 |
| Winners | 36 | 45 |
| %Winners | 39% | 51% |
Both Kudla and Broady played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Denis Kudla dropped 1 set, while Liam Broady conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kudla and Broady have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Kudla played 1 game less than Broady. The American scored 36 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Liam blasted 45 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kudla | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 6 |
| 1st in | 49/94 | 61/88 |
| %1st in | 52% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 45/61 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 13/27 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 48% |
Kudla bagged 14 aces . Broady struck 6 aces . Kudla won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kudla | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 67% |
| Conceded | 12 | 6 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Denis broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Denis surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Broady broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Liam conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kudla | |||
| R1 Machac |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-83 | 93-83 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 49/94 | 49/94 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 36/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 23/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Broady | |||
| R1 Bolt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 89-80 | 89-80 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 61/88 | 61/88 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 45/61 | 45/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWWLW
LLLLLLLLWL Tennis Scores in Nottingham 1 Challenger
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-0 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-4 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas RosolRosol – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-60) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-610 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-710 7-66) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tomas MachacMachac (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Alex BoltBolt (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (4-6 7-61 7-65) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (7-6(5) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-7(10) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-6(0)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Kevin AndersonAnderson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Matthew EbdenEbden (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Denis KudlaKudla (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-1) – H2H and prediction
