![Prediction And Head To Head Daniel Evans Vs. Matthew Ebden N4k7qxmabd Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Matthew Ebden](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Daniel-Evans-vs.-Matthew-Ebden-N4K7qXMabd.jpg)
Daniel Evans and Matthew Ebden will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.32
Matthew Ebden -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Matthew Ebden
This will be the 3rd time that Daniel Evans and Matthew Ebden clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Ebden (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Ebden won 7-6(1) 6-2 in the quarter in the Nottingham Challenger back in 2013.
Daniel Evans
Ranked no. 27, Evans reached the 2nd round after defeating Thanasi Kokkinakis 4-6 7-61 7-65.
In the 1st round against Kokkinakis, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-61 7-65). During the match, Evans scored 112 points vs Kokkinakis’s 105. Evans was exceptionally aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Regarding the service games, Evans recorded 15 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Evans was very efficient on serve to win 71% (47/66) of his 1st serve and 71% (29/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Evans broke Kokkinakis once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Evans has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (338-177). 1-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Evans has an overall 57-29 record in the last years on grass.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in in Melbourne where he overcame Felix Auger Aliassime in the final 6-2 6-3.
Evans has an overall 13-10 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2019. See his history.
Matthew Ebden
Ranked no. 230, the Australian got to the 2nd round after defeating Arthur Fery 6-3 6-4, Viktor Troicki 6-3 4-6 6-2 and Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Peniston (6-4 6-4). During the match Ebden scored 71 points vs Peniston’s 58. Ebden was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Ebden managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Matthew Ebden was very efficient on serve to win 84% (31/37) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Matthew broke Peniston twice after converting 18% of his break points (2/11).
Ebden’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Marseille.
Ebden has a composed 12-9 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Evans | Ebden |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 36 | 66 |
Pts | 112-105 | 234-187 |
Total Points | 217 | 421 |
Winners | 47 | 104 |
%Winners | 42% | 44% |
Evans played 1 match while Ebden competed in 3 matches. Ebden started his run from the qualifications while Evans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniel Evans lost 1 set, while Matthew Ebden dropped 1 set. Evans has played 4 set(s) less than Ebden (3 vs 7). Therefore, Evans played 30 games less than Ebden. Daniel scored 47 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Matthew bagged 104 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Evans | Ebden |
---|---|---|
Aces | 15 | 13 |
Avg per match | 15 | 4.3 |
1st in | 66/107 | 134/210 |
%1st in | 62% | 64% |
1st pts | 47/66 | 104/134 |
%1st pts | 71% | 78% |
2nd pts | 29/41 | 42/76 |
%2nd pts | 71% | 55% |
Evans managed to score 15 aces . Ebden fired 13 aces (4.3 per match). Evans won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Ebden won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Evans | Ebden |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 9 |
Converted | 1/5 | 9/30 |
% Converted | 20% | 30% |
Conceded | 6 | 14 |
Saved | 4 | 11 |
% Saved | 67% | 79% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Evans broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Matthew broke his opponents 9 times with a 30% conversion rate. Ebden conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Evans | |||
R1 Kokkinakis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-61 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
pts | 112-105 | 112-105 | |
Total points | 217 | 217 | |
Winners | 47 | 47 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 15 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 66/107 | 66/107 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 47/66 | 47/66 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Ebden | |||||
Q1 Fery |
Q3 Troicki |
R1 Peniston |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 27 | 20 | 66 | |
pts | 65-54 | 98-75 | 71-58 | 234-187 | |
Total points | 119 | 173 | 129 | 421 | |
Winners | 32 | 41 | 31 | 104 | |
%Winners | 49% | 42% | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 3 | 7 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
1st in | 40/67 | 57/82 | 37/61 | 134/210 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 70% | 61% | 64% | |
1st pts | 32/40 | 41/57 | 31/37 | 104/134 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 72% | 84% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 12/27 | 16/25 | 14/24 | 42/76 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 64% | 58% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/12 | 2/11 | 9/30 | |
Converted % | 43% | 33% | 18% | 30% | |
Conceded | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 3/5 | 2/2 | 11 | |
Saved % | 86% | 60% | 100% | 246% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Nottingham 1 Challenger
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-60) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Marc PolmansPolmans (7-610 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-710 7-66) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-0 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-4 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas RosolRosol – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (4-6 7-61 7-65) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Tomas MachacMachac (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Alex BoltBolt (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (7-6(5) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-7(10) 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-6(0)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Kevin AndersonAnderson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Matthew EbdenEbden (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Denis KudlaKudla (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-1) – H2H and prediction