Ruben Bemelmans and Borna Gojo will play each other in the qualifications of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ruben Bemelmans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ruben Bemelmans is the pick to win this match.
Ruben Bemelmans -> 1.6
Borna Gojo -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ruben Bemelmans vs. Borna Gojo
This will be the 2nd time that Ruben Bemelmans and Borna Gojo fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Gojo (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Gojo won 7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(6) in the qualifications in Winston Salem back in 2017.
Ruben Bemelmans
Ranked no. 201, Ruben got to the qualifications after beating John-Patrick Smith 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications, Bemelmans had a good straight sets win against Smith (7-64 6-3). During the match, Bemelmans scored 73 points vs Smith’s 63. Bemelmans was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bemelmans managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Ruben Bemelmans lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Bemelmans put 65% of his first serves in, winning 80% (36/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Bemelmans broke Smith twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Bemelmans has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (327-253). 1-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bemelmans has an overall 44-32 match record in the last years on grass.
Ruben’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Cherbourg Challenger.
Ruben has a composed 6-7 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2013 and 2019. See his history.
Borna Gojo
Ranked no. 233, the Croatian reached the qualifications after defeating Nathaniel Lammons 7-62 6-79 6-4.
In the qualifications, Gojo defeated Lammons (7-62 6-79 6-4). During the match Gojo scored 119 points vs Lammons’s 112. The Croatian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 68 winners.
About the serving games, Gojo buried his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Borna Gojo was quite effective on serve to win 78% (68/87) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Lammons once.
Borna has a compiled 6-7 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bemelmans | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 36 |
| Pts | 73-63 | 119-112 |
| Total Points | 136 | 231 |
| Winners | 36 | 68 |
| %Winners | 49% | 57% |
Both Bemelmans and Gojo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Borna Gojo conceded 1 set while Ruben Bemelmans hasn’t conceded a set so far. Bemelmans has played 1 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Bemelmans played 14 games less than Gojo. Bemelmans scored 36 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Borna bagged 68 winners (57%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bemelmans | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 20 |
| 1st in | 45/69 | 87/124 |
| %1st in | 65% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 36/45 | 68/87 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/24 | 19/37 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 51% |
Bemelmans recorded 7 aces . Gojo struck 20 aces . Bemelmans won 80% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bemelmans | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 1 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 1/1 |
| % Converted | 29% | 100% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Ruben broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Ruben dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Gojo broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. Gojo was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Bemelmans | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-63 | 73-63 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/69 | 45/69 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 36/45 | 36/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/24 | 10/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gojo | |||
| Q1 Lammons |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-79 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 119-112 | 119-112 | |
| Total points | 231 | 231 | |
| Winners | 68 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 57% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 20 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 87/124 | 87/124 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 68/87 | 68/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/37 | 19/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Antoine HoangHoang (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Matthew EbdenEbden (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Borna GojoGojo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Igor SijslingSijsling (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Kevin AndersonAnderson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Lukas RosolRosol (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
