![Prediction And Head To Head Harriet Dart Vs. En Shuo Liang Dbv7ykg2fn Prediction and head to head Harriet Dart vs. En Shuo Liang](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Harriet-Dart-vs.-En-Shuo-Liang-DBv7YkG2Fn.jpg)
Harriet Dart and En Shuo Liang will face off in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on Court 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Harriet Dart who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Harriet Dart is the pick to win this match.
Harriet Dart -> 1.24
En Shuo Liang -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Harriet Dart vs. En Shuo Liang
There is no head to head record between Harriet Dart and En Shuo Liang since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Harriet Dart
Ranked no. 143, Harriet got to the qualifications after beating Barbara Haas 6-4 4-6 6-1 and Gabriela Talaba 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Brit defeated Talaba (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match, Dart scored 85 points vs Talaba’s 72. Harriet was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Dart scored 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Harriet Dart lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Dart put 53% of her first serves in, winning 72% (28/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. Harriet broke Talaba 7 times after converting 54% of her break points (7/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Dart started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has lost 2 set in this event to conquer 55% of the points she played.
Dart has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 57% of her matches (222-165). 8-3 on clay in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Dart has an overall19-17 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Harriet’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W100 Charleston.
Dart has a compiled 12-10 win-loss record in 2021, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2020. See her history.
En Shuo Liang
Ranked no. 295, Shuo got to the qualifications after beating Caty McNally 4-1 ret. and Asia Muhammad 7-69 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Muhammad (7-69 6-4). During the match Shuo scored 84 points vs Muhammad’s 82. En was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Shuo scored 3 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. En Shuo Liang lost the serve once and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Shuo put 59% of her first serves in, winning 72% (42/58) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (19/41) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Muhammad twice.
En has an overall 9-10 win-loss record in 2021, 2-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2019. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Dart | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
Tot Games | 53 | 28 |
Pts | 174-140 | 107-96 |
Total Points | 314 | 203 |
Winners | 61 | 52 |
%Winners | 35% | 49% |
Both Dart and Shuo played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Harriet Dart surrendered 2 sets while En Shuo Liang hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Dart has played 2 sets more than Shuo (6 vs 4). Therefore, Dart played 25 games more than Shuo. The Brit scored 61 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese fired 52 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Dart | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 5 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2.5 |
1st in | 90/152 | 72/117 |
%1st in | 59% | 62% |
1st pts | 61/90 | 52/72 |
%1st pts | 68% | 72% |
2nd pts | 25/62 | 20/45 |
%2nd pts | 40% | 44% |
Dart made 4 aces (2 per match). Shuo recorded 5 aces (2.5 per match). Dart won 68% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Shuo won 72% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Dart | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Won | 15 | 4 |
Converted | 15/22 | 4/8 |
% Converted | 68% | 50% |
Conceded | 22 | 10 |
Saved | 11 | 8 |
% Saved | 50% | 80% |
Times Broken | 11 | 2 |
Dart broke her opponents 15 times with a 68% conversion rate. Harriet surrendered her serve 11 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Shuo broke her opponents 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve twice and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
Dart | ||||
Q1 Haas |
Q2 Talaba |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 26 | 53 | |
pts | 89-68 | 85-72 | 174-140 | |
Total points | 157 | 157 | 314 | |
Winners | 33 | 28 | 61 | |
%Winners | 37% | 33% | 35% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 51/78 | 39/74 | 90/152 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 53% | 59% | |
1st pts | 33/51 | 28/39 | 61/90 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 72% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 12/27 | 13/35 | 25/62 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 37% | 40% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
Converted | 8/9 | 7/13 | 15/22 | |
Converted % | 89% | 54% | 68% | |
Conceded | 9 | 13 | 22 | |
Saved | 4/9 | 7/13 | 11 | |
Saved % | 44% | 54% | 49% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 6 | 11 |
Shuo | ||||
Q1 McNally |
Q2 Muhammad |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-1 ret. | 7-69 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 5 | 23 | 28 | |
pts | 23-14 | 84-82 | 107-96 | |
Total points | 37 | 166 | 203 | |
Winners | 10 | 42 | 52 | |
%Winners | 43% | 50% | 49% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
1st in | 14/18 | 58/99 | 72/117 | |
% 1st in | 78% | 59% | 62% | |
1st pts | 10/14 | 42/58 | 52/72 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 1/4 | 19/41 | 20/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 25% | 46% | 44% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Converted | 2/6 | 2/2 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 33% | 100% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 9 | 10 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 8/9 | 8 | |
Saved % | 0% | 89% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Sara ErraniErrani (4-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Mayar SherifSherif (7-5 5-7 7-61) – See score progression
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Carole MonnetMonnet (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko – Mona BarthelBarthel (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Olga GovortsovaGovortsova – Jana FettFett (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Elitsa KostovaKostova (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (w/o) – See score progression
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Ankita RainaRaina (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Storm SandersSanders – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ellen PerezPerez – Alexandra DulgheruDulgheru (6-0 4-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Mayo HibiHibi (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Tsvetana PironkovaPironkova (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Kristina KucovaKucova (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Claire LiuLiu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Timea BabosBabos (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Mandy MinellaMinella (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- En Shuo LiangShuo Liang – Asia MuhammadMuhammad (7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Antonia LottnerLottner (6-75 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Lois BoissonBoisson (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Marie BenoitBenoit (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Marie BenoitBenoit (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Claire LiuLiu (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (7-6(3) 6-0) – See score progression
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Tsvetana PironkovaPironkova (6-4 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Storm SandersSanders – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Mandy MinellaMinella (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (w/o) – See score progression
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Kristina KucovaKucova (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Kurumi NaraNara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Grace MinMin – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandra KrunicKrunic – Olga GovortsovaGovortsova (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- En Shuo LiangShuo Liang – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Carol ZhaoZhao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Xiyu WangWang (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Monica NiculescuNiculescu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ellen PerezPerez – Greetje MinnenMinnen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Magdalena FrechFrech (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (1-0) – H2H and prediction