Dominic Thiem and John Isner will clash against each other in the quarter of the Mutua Madrid Open for the 4th time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on MANOLO SANTANA STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Thiem who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dominic Thiem is the pick to win this match.
Dominic Thiem -> 1.37
John Isner -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominic Thiem vs. John Isner
This will be the 4th time that Dominic Thiem and John Isner play each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Thiem (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Thiem won 6-7(15) 7-6(2) 10-7 in the R in Prague back in 2017.
Dominic Thiem
Ranked no. 4, Thiem got to the quarter after beating Marcos Giron 6-1 6-3 and Alex De Minaur 7-67 6-4.
In the 3rd round, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against De Minaur (7-67 6-4). During the match Thiem scored 77 points vs De Minaur’s 69. Thiem was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thiem managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Dominic Thiem lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Thiem put 64% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Thiem broke De Minaur 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Thiem started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Thiem has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 68% of his matches (415-196). 2-0 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Thiem has a 224-67 record in the last years on clay.
Thiem has a 7-4 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Madrid
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2017 and 2018. See his history.
John Isner
Ranked no. 39, Isner got to the quarter after beating Miomir Kecmanovic 6-4 7-66, Roberto Bautista Agut 6-4 6-74 7-66 and Andrey Rublev 7-64 3-6 7-64.
In the 3rd round, John defeated Rublev (7-64 3-6 7-64).-95) than Rublev. In fact, the world no. 4 won 95 points vs Rublev’s. That means that Isner was more focused during the important points. Isner was exceptionally aggressive to blast 63 winners.
Talking about serving, Isner buried his opponent with 29 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. John Isner lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Isner put 67% of his first serves in, winning 81% (63/78) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
John started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
The American has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Thiem | Isner |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
Tot Games | 39 | 94 |
Pts | 130-101 | 283-278 |
Total Points | 231 | 561 |
Winners | 59 | 169 |
%Winners | 45% | 60% |
Thiem played 2 matches while Isner competed in 3 matches. At the moment, John Isner surrendered 2 sets while Dominic Thiem hasn’t dropped a set so far. Thiem has played 4 set(s) less than Isner (4 vs 8). Therefore, Thiem played 55 games less than Isner. The Austrian scored 59 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 169 winners (60%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Thiem | Isner |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 89 |
Avg per match | 4.5 | 29.7 |
1st in | 79/113 | 206/289 |
%1st in | 70% | 71% |
1st pts | 59/79 | 169/206 |
%1st pts | 75% | 82% |
2nd pts | 20/34 | 43/83 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 52% |
Thiem bagged 9 aces (4.5 per match). Isner recorded 89 aces (29.7 per match). Thiem won 75% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Isner won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Thiem | Isner |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 2 |
Converted | 7/18 | 2/12 |
% Converted | 39% | 17% |
Conceded | 6 | 7 |
Saved | 4 | 5 |
% Saved | 67% | 71% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Thiem broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Austrian dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents twice with a 17% conversion rate. Isner conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Thiem | ||||
R2 Giron |
R3 De Minaur |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | 7-67 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 23 | 39 | |
pts | 53-32 | 77-69 | 130-101 | |
Total points | 85 | 146 | 231 | |
Winners | 26 | 33 | 59 | |
%Winners | 49% | 43% | 45% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
1st in | 32/40 | 47/73 | 79/113 | |
% 1st in | 80% | 64% | 70% | |
1st pts | 26/32 | 33/47 | 59/79 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 70% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 6/8 | 14/26 | 20/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 54% | 59% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 3/9 | 7/18 | |
Converted % | 44% | 33% | 39% | |
Conceded | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Isner | |||||
R1 Kecmanovic |
R2 Bautista-Agut |
R3 Rublev |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-66 | 6-4 6-74 7-66 | 7-64 3-6 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 36 | 35 | 94 | |
pts | 73-61 | 115-109 | 95-108 | 283-278 | |
Total points | 134 | 224 | 203 | 561 | |
Winners | 45 | 61 | 63 | 169 | |
%Winners | 62% | 53% | 66% | 60% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 28 | 32 | 29 | 89 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
1st in | 53/73 | 75/100 | 78/116 | 206/289 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 75% | 67% | 71% | |
1st pts | 45/53 | 61/75 | 63/78 | 169/206 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 81% | 81% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 15/25 | 16/38 | 43/83 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | 42% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Converted | 1/2 | 1/10 | 0/0 | 2/12 | |
Converted % | 50% | 10% | – | 17% | |
Conceded | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 33% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Madrid
- Casper RuudRuud – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Rafael NadalNadal – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian GarinGarin – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (6-4 6-72 6-1) – See score progression
- John IsnerIsner – Andrey RublevRublev (7-64 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Daniel EvansEvans (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Rafael NadalNadal – Alexander ZverevZverev (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dominic ThiemThiem – John IsnerIsner (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Casper RuudRuud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Christian GarinGarin (1-1) – H2H and prediction