Federico Gaio and Lukas Lacko will play each other in the quarter of the Quimper 2 Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Gaio who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Gaio is the pick to win this match.
Federico Gaio -> 1.80
Lukas Lacko -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Lukas Lacko
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Gaio and Lukas Lacko square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lacko (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
Federico Gaio
Ranked no. 138, the Italian reached the quarter after beating Hugo Gaston 7-65 6-4 and Marc-Andrea Huesler 6-4 3-6 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Federico defeated Huesler (6-4 3-6 7-66).-98) than Huesler. In fact, the world no. 138 won 98 points vs Huesler’s. That means that Gaio was more focused during the important points. Gaio was extremely aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaio fired 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Federico Gaio lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gaio put 68% of his first serves in, winning 75% (48/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (10/30) on the 2nd serve. Gaio broke Huesler 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian has dropped 1 set in this tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Gaio has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (350-271). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gaio has a 30-36 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Federico has a 4-3 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper 2 Challenger
The Italian didn’t play in the Quimper 2 Challenger in 2020.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 200, Lukas reached the quarter after defeating Mathias Bourgue 6-2 6-2 and Arthur Cazaux w/o.
In the 2nd round, Lukas defeated Cazaux (w/o). During the match Lacko and Cazaux scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 138 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Lacko couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lukas Lacko conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Slovakian has a 1-2 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaio | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 16 |
| Pts | 181-176 | 55-41 |
| Total Points | 357 | 96 |
| Winners | 82 | 19 |
| %Winners | 45% | 35% |
Gaio played 2 matches while Lacko competed in 1 match. At the moment, Federico Gaio dropped 1 set while Lukas Lacko hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Gaio has played 3 sets more than Lacko (5 vs 2). Therefore, Gaio played 39 games more than Lacko. Gaio scored 82 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Lacko struck 19 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaio | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 112/173 | 21/46 |
| %1st in | 65% | 46% |
| 1st pts | 82/112 | 19/21 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 26/61 | 13/25 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 52% |
Gaio blasted 6 aces (3 per match). Lacko managed to score 3 aces . Gaio won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Lacko won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaio | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/17 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 35% | 44% |
| Conceded | 13 | 0 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 62% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Federico broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Gaio conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Lukas was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Gaio | ||||
| R1 Gaston |
R2 Huesler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | 6-4 3-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 32 | 55 | |
| pts | 83-75 | 98-101 | 181-176 | |
| Total points | 158 | 199 | 357 | |
| Winners | 34 | 48 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 49% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 48/79 | 64/94 | 112/173 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 68% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 48/64 | 82/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 75% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 10/30 | 26/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 33% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/9 | 4/8 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 50% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 50% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Lacko | ||||
| R1 Bourgue |
R2 Cazaux |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 0 | 16 | |
| pts | 55-41 | – | 55-41 | |
| Total points | 96 | 0 | 96 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | ||
| %Winners | 35% | NAN% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 21/46 | / | 21/46 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | – | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | / | 19/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | – | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | / | 13/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | – | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | / | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | – | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Federico GaioGaio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Tobias KamkeKamke (1-1) – H2H and prediction
