Lucas Pouille and Tobias Kamke will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Quimper 2 Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lucas Pouille who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lucas Pouille is the pick to win this match.
Lucas Pouille -> 1.53
Tobias Kamke -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lucas Pouille vs. Tobias Kamke
This will be the 3rd time that Lucas Pouille and Tobias Kamke fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Kamke won 6-3 6-2 in the quarter in the Captif Challenger back in 2014.
Lucas Pouille
Ranked no. 74, Pouille reached the quarter after beating Yannick Maden 7-5 4-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Pouille defeated Maden (7-5 4-6 6-2). During the match Pouille scored 97 points vs Maden’s 88. The French player was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pouille bagged 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lucas Pouille lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Pouille put 55% of his first serves in, winning 81% (42/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (18/43) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Maden 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Pouille has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (285-186). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Pouille has a 63-40 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Pouille has a 1-1 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper 2 Challenger
Lucas didn’t compete in the Quimper 2 Challenger in 2020.
Tobias Kamke
Ranked no. 235, Tobias reached the quarter after defeating Julian Lenz 6-2 2-6 6-3, Tristan Lamasine 7-5 6-4 and Denis Istomin 5-7 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Istomin, Tobias recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-4). During the match Kamke scored 96 points vs Istomin’s 95. Kamke was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Kamke struck 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tobias Kamke lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kamke put 59% of his first serves in, winning 64% (39/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (24/43) on the 2nd serve. Kamke was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Istomin 5 times.
The German has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2021, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pouille | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 79 |
| Pts | 97-88 | 251-222 |
| Total Points | 185 | 473 |
| Winners | 42 | 97 |
| %Winners | 43% | 39% |
Pouille played 1 match while Kamke competed in 3 matches. Kamke started his run from the qualifications while Pouille had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Lucas Pouille conceded 1 set, while Tobias Kamke dropper 2 sets. Pouille has played 5 set(s) less than Kamke (3 vs 8). Therefore, Pouille played 49 games less than Kamke. Lucas scored 42 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 97 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pouille | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 52/95 | 135/227 |
| %1st in | 55% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 97/135 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 18/43 | 53/92 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 58% |
Pouille made 6 aces . Kamke blasted 7 aces (2.3 per match). Pouille won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Kamke won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pouille | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 12 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 12/19 |
| % Converted | 45% | 63% |
| Conceded | 7 | 16 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 57% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 12 times with a 63% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pouille | |||
| R1 Maden |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 97-88 | 97-88 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/95 | 52/95 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 42/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/43 | 18/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Kamke | |||||
| Q1 Lenz |
Q3 Lamasine |
R1 Istomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | 7-5 6-4 | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 22 | 32 | 79 | |
| pts | 79-67 | 76-60 | 96-95 | 251-222 | |
| Total points | 146 | 136 | 191 | 473 | |
| Winners | 30 | 28 | 39 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 37% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 39/62 | 35/61 | 61/104 | 135/227 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 57% | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 28/35 | 39/61 | 97/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 80% | 64% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 16/26 | 24/43 | 53/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 62% | 56% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/6 | 5/5 | 12/19 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 100% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 5/6 | 4/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 83% | 50% | 133% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLLLW
Tennis Scores in Quimper 2 Challenger
- Evan FurnessFurness – Antoine HoangHoang (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-2 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Hugo GastonGaston (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-4 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Denis IstominIstomin (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Lukas RosolRosol (6-1 5-7 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Yannick MadenMaden (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Antoine HoangHoang (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Matteo ViolaViola (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Lucas PouillePouille (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Daniel MasurMasur (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (0-0) – H2H and prediction
