Tobias Kamke and Tristan Lamasine will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Quimper 2 Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Lamasine who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Lamasine is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Lamasine -> 1.63
Tobias Kamke -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tobias Kamke vs. Tristan Lamasine
This will be the 3rd time that Tobias Kamke and Tristan Lamasine play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Kamke and Lamasine (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Kamke won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Kazan Challenger back in 2016.
Tobias Kamke
Ranked no. 236, the German reached the 2nd round after beating Julian Lenz 6-2 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Tobias defeated Lenz (6-2 2-6 6-3). During the match Kamke scored 79 points vs Lenz’s 67. Tobias was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kamke recorded 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Tobias Kamke was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kamke broke Lenz 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Kamke has a positive record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (262-247). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kamke has a 97-69 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kamke has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper 2 Challenger
Tobias didn’t play in the Quimper 2 Challenger in 2020.
Tristan Lamasine
Ranked no. 249, Tristan reached the 2nd round after defeating Illya Marchenko 6-0 4-6 7-61.
In the qualifications, Lamasine defeated Marchenko (6-0 4-6 7-61). During the match Lamasine scored 119 points vs Marchenko’s 98. Lamasine was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Lamasine fired 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tristan Lamasine lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lamasine put 63% of his first serves in, winning 77% (46/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Tristan broke Marchenko 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Tristan has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kamke | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 25 | 29 |
Pts | 79-67 | 119-98 |
Total Points | 146 | 217 |
Winners | 30 | 46 |
%Winners | 38% | 39% |
Both Kamke and Lamasine played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Tobias Kamke conceded 1 set, while Tristan Lamasine dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Kamke and Lamasine have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Kamke played 4 games less than Lamasine. Kamke scored 30 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Lamasine recorded 46 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kamke | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 6 |
Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
1st in | 39/62 | 60/96 |
%1st in | 63% | 63% |
1st pts | 30/39 | 46/60 |
%1st pts | 77% | 77% |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 18/36 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Kamke made 4 aces . Lamasine scored 6 aces . Kamke won 77% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Lamasine won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kamke | Lamasine |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/13 |
% Converted | 50% | 31% |
Conceded | 2 | 7 |
Saved | 0 | 5 |
% Saved | 0% | 71% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Tristan broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Lamasine conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Kamke | |||
Q1 Lenz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 79-67 | 79-67 | |
Total points | 146 | 146 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/62 | 39/62 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Lamasine | |||
Q1 Marchenko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 4-6 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 119-98 | 119-98 | |
Total points | 217 | 217 | |
Winners | 46 | 46 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 60/96 | 60/96 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 46/60 | 46/60 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 18/36 | 18/36 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo ViolaViola – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick MadenMaden – Lucas PouillePouille (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Tobias KamkeKamke (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Daniel MasurMasur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc (0-0) – H2H and prediction