Federico Gaio and Brandon Nakashima will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 0
Federico Gaio -> 0
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Brandon Nakashima
There is no head to head record between Federico Gaio and Brandon Nakashima since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Federico Gaio
Ranked no. 136, Federico got to the 2nd round after beating Ernests Gulbis 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Gulbis (6-4 7-63). During the match Gaio scored 68 points vs Gulbis’s 60. Federico was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaio fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Federico Gaio lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gaio put 56% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Gaio was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Gulbis twice.
Gaio has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (348-270). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gaio has a 28-35 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Gaio has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Gaio didn’t play in the Quimper Challenger in 2020.
Brandon Nakashima
Ranked no. 163 (career high), Brandon got to the 2nd round after beating Maxime Janvier 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nakashima had a good straight sets win against Janvier (6-3 6-2). During the match Nakashima scored 61 points vs Janvier’s 43. The American was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Nakashima scored 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Brandon Nakashima conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Nakashima put 70% of his first serves in, winning 84% (31/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Nakashima broke Janvier 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The American has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gaio | Nakashima |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 23 | 17 |
Pts | 68-60 | 61-43 |
Total Points | 128 | 104 |
Winners | 31 | 31 |
%Winners | 46% | 51% |
Both Gaio and Nakashima played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gaio and Nakashima have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gaio played 6 games more than Nakashima. Gaio scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Brandon struck 31 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gaio | Nakashima |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 5 |
Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
1st in | 38/68 | 37/53 |
%1st in | 56% | 70% |
1st pts | 31/38 | 31/37 |
%1st pts | 82% | 84% |
2nd pts | 15/30 | 7/16 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 44% |
Gaio blasted 2 aces . Nakashima blasted 5 aces . Gaio won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Nakashima won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gaio | Nakashima |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 3 |
Converted | 2/2 | 3/9 |
% Converted | 100% | 33% |
Conceded | 3 | 2 |
Saved | 2 | 2 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Federico broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Brandon broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Brandon was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Gaio | |||
R1 Gulbis |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 68-60 | 68-60 | |
Total points | 128 | 128 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Nakashima | |||
R1 Janvier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 61-43 | 61-43 | |
Total points | 104 | 104 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 37/53 | 37/53 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 31/37 | 31/37 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis KudlaKudla (6-2 7-66) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (6-1 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-63 4-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Lukas RosolRosol (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-3 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Arthur CazauxCazaux (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Lukas LackoLacko (6-3 6-72 7-64) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Hugo GastonGaston (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Ernests GulbisGulbis (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis KudlaKudla (6-2 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine Cornut-ChauvincCornut-Chauvinc – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction