Baran Cengiz and Georgii Kravchenko will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Antalya (M15) for the 1st time in their career. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Georgii Kravchenko who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Georgii Kravchenko is the pick to win this match.
Georgii Kravchenko -> 1.182
Baran Cengiz -> 4.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Baran Cengiz vs. Georgii Kravchenko
There is no head to head record between Baran Cengiz and Georgii Kravchenko since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Baran Cengiz
Ranked no. (career high), Baran got to the 2nd round after defeating Burak Bilgin 6-2 6-72 10-6, Gokberk Saritas 6-1 6-2 and Bora Sengul 7-61 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cengiz had a good straight sets win against Sengul (7-61 6-4). During the match Cengiz scored 80 points vs Sengul’s 66. Cengiz was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cengiz scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 9 double faults. Baran Cengiz lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Cengiz put 54% of his first serves in, winning 76% (31/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (14/35) on the 2nd serve. Cengiz broke Sengul 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Cengiz has a solid win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 63% of his matches (12-7). 11-4 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Cengiz has a 11-5 win-loss record in the last 2 years on clay.
Baran has a 11-5 win-loss record in 2020, 11-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Antalya (M15)
The Turk lost in the 1st round to Koray Kirci.
Georgii Kravchenko
Ranked no. 606 (career high), the Ukrainian got to the 2nd round after defeating Taiyo Yamanaka 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Kravchenko had a good straight sets win against Yamanaka (6-3 6-0). During the match Kravchenko scored 56 points vs Yamanaka’s 33. Georgii was pretty aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about serving, Kravchenko scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Georgii Kravchenko was quite effective on serve to win 89% (16/18) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kravchenko broke Yamanaka 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The Ukrainian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya.
Kravchenko has a 23-11 win-loss record in 2020, 18-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Antalya (M15)
Kravchenko lost in the quarter to Denys Klok.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cengiz | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 69 | 15 |
| Pts | 80-66 | 56-33 |
| Total Points | 146 | 89 |
| Winners | 31 | 16 |
| %Winners | 39% | 29% |
Cengiz played 3 matches while Kravchenko competed in 1 match. Cengiz started his run from the qualifications while Kravchenko had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Baran Cengiz conceded 1 set while Georgii Kravchenko hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Cengiz has played 5 sets more than Kravchenko (7 vs 2). Therefore, Cengiz played 54 games more than Kravchenko. Baran scored 31 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Georgii made 16 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cengiz | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0.3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 41/76 | 18/35 |
| %1st in | 54% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 16/18 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 14/35 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 59% |
Cengiz blasted 1 ace (0.3 per match). Kravchenko also blasted 2 aces . Cengiz won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Kravchenko won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cengiz | Kravchenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 63% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Baran broke his opponents 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Cengiz conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Kravchenko broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Georgii conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cengiz | |||||
| Q2 Bilgin |
Q3 Saritas |
R1 Sengul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-72 10-6 | 6-1 6-2 | 7-61 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 15 | 23 | 69 | |
| pts | – | – | 80-66 | 80-66 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | 146 | 146 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |||
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |||
| 1st in | / | / | 41/76 | 41/76 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | NAN% | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | / | / | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | NAN% | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | / | / | 14/35 | 14/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |||
| Converted | / | / | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | NAN% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/ | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 63% | 21% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |||
| Kravchenko | |||||
| R1 Yamanaka |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |||
| pts | 56-33 | 56-33 | |||
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |||
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |||
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |||
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1st in | 18/35 | 18/35 | |||
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |||
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |||
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |||
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |||
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |||
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |||
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |||
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLWLW Tennis Scores in M15 Antalya
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Berk IlkelIlkel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Cengiz AksuAksu – Sarp AgabigunAgabigun (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Benjamin DhoeDhoe (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Aleksandr BrayninBraynin (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Baran CengizCengiz – Bora SengulSengul (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Yanki ErelErel – Ilya SnitariSnitari (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ivan NedelkoNedelko – Mert Naci TurkerNaci Turker (7-5 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Romain FauconFaucon (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Vladislav IvanovIvanov – Peter MakkMakk (2-6 7-62 6-0) – See score progression
- Vasil DimitrovDimitrov – Danylo VeremeychukVeremeychuk (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Emir SendoganSendogan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Umut AkkoyunAkkoyun – Pavle DaljevDaljev (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Marsel IlhanIlhan – Timur KiuamovKiuamov (2-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Taiyo YamanakaYamanaka (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – David BogatinBogatin (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Sergey FominFomin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Cengiz AksuAksu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vladislav IvanovIvanov – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanki ErelErel – Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marsel IlhanIlhan – Umut AkkoyunAkkoyun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Baran CengizCengiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
