Lea Boskovic and Qinwen Zheng will fight against each other in the final of Selva Gardena (W25) for the 1st time in their career. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Qinwen Zheng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Qinwen Zheng is the pick to win this match.
Qinwen Zheng -> 1.3
Lea Boskovic -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lea Boskovic vs. Qinwen Zheng
There is no head to head record between Lea Boskovic and Qinwen Zheng since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Lea Boskovic
Ranked no. 304, Lea reached the final after beating Maja Chwalinska 3-6 6-3 6-1, Conny Perrin 7-64 4-1 ret., Marta Kostyuk 6-1 6-1 and Ana Konjuh 7-65 2-3 ret..
In the semifinal, Lea defeated Konjuh (7-65 2-3 ret.).-55) than Konjuh. In fact, the world no. 304 won 55 points vs Konjuh’s. That means that Boskovic was more focused during the important points. Lea was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Boskovic managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Lea Boskovic was quite effective on serve to win 73% (29/40) of her 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The Croatian broke Konjuh once after converting 33% of her break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian has lost 1 set in this event to win 59% of the points she played.
Boskovic has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 65% of her matches (111-61). 5-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Boskovic has a 7-6 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Boskovic has a 17-10 win-loss record in 2020, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Selva Gardena (W25)
Lea didn’t play in the Selva Gardena (W25) in 2019.
Qinwen Zheng
Ranked no. 325, Qinwen reached the final after defeating Verena Hofer 6-1 6-0, Anna-Lena Friedsam 3-6 6-3 6-2, Kathinka Von Deichmann 6-3 6-2, Federica Di Sarra 6-1 6-4 and Susan Bandecchi 6-2 6-4.
In the semifinal, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Bandecchi (6-2 6-4). During the match Zheng scored 70 points vs Bandecchi’s 52. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Zheng recorded 16 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Qinwen Zheng lost the serve once and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Zheng put 63% of her first serves in, winning 78% (32/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (9/24) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Bandecchi 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 59% of the points she played.
Zheng has a 37-8 win-loss record in 2020, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Boskovic | Zheng |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 91 |
| Pts | 143-101 | 330-227 |
| Total Points | 244 | 557 |
| Winners | 53 | 129 |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% |
Boskovic played 2 matches while Zheng competed in 5 matches. Zheng started her run from the qualifications while Boskovic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Lea Boskovic conceded 1 set, while Qinwen Zheng dropper 1 set. Boskovic has played 6 set(s) less than Zheng (5 vs 11). Therefore, Boskovic played 52 games less than Zheng. Boskovic scored 53 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Zheng recorded 129 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Boskovic | Zheng |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 56 |
| Avg per match | 0.5 | 11.2 |
| 1st in | 80/123 | 154/284 |
| %1st in | 65% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 53/80 | 129/154 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 27/43 | 73/131 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 56% |
Boskovic scored 1 ace (0.5 per match). Zheng also made 56 aces (11.2 per match). Boskovic won 66% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Zheng won 84% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Boskovic | Zheng |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 19 |
| Converted | 10/22 | 19/45 |
| % Converted | 45% | 42% |
| Conceded | 7 | 18 |
| Saved | 4 | 15 |
| % Saved | 57% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Croatian broke her opponents 10 times with a 45% conversion rate. Boskovic dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. Zheng broke her opponents 19 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Boskovic | ||||||
| R1 Chwalinska |
R2 Perrin |
1/4 Kostyuk |
1/2 Konjuh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | 7-64 4-1 ret. | 6-1 6-1 | 7-65 2-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 | 14 | 18 | 75 | |
| pts | 81-68 | 72-62 | 62-33 | 55-56 | 270-219 | |
| Total points | 149 | 134 | 95 | 111 | 489 | |
| Winners | 31 | 27 | 22 | 29 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | 35% | 53% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 46/73 | 37/59 | 34/50 | 40/51 | 157/233 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | 68% | 78% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/46 | 27/37 | 22/34 | 29/40 | 109/157 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 73% | 65% | 73% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 12/22 | 12/16 | 6/11 | 45/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 55% | 75% | 55% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 3/6 | 5/9 | 1/3 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 56% | 33% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 2/3 | 3/3 | 3/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 67% | 100% | 75% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| Zheng | |||||||
| Q3 Hofer |
R1 Friedsam |
R2 Von Deichmann |
1/4 Di Sarra |
1/2 Bandecchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 26 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 91 | |
| pts | 53-24 | 86-73 | 64-40 | 57-38 | 70-52 | 330-227 | |
| Total points | 77 | 159 | 104 | 95 | 122 | 557 | |
| Winners | 21 | 33 | 23 | 20 | 32 | 129 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 38% | 36% | 35% | 46% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 56 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 25 | |
| 1st in | 23/39 | 42/79 | 24/44 | 24/57 | 41/65 | 154/284 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 53% | 55% | 42% | 63% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 21/23 | 33/42 | 23/24 | 20/24 | 32/41 | 129/154 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 79% | 96% | 83% | 78% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 23/37 | 14/20 | 19/33 | 9/24 | 73/131 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 62% | 70% | 58% | 38% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 19 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/12 | 3/13 | 4/4 | 4/9 | 19/45 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 25% | 23% | 100% | 44% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/5 | 2/2 | 5/6 | 4/5 | 15 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 100% | 83% | 80% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLWWL
WLWWWWLWWW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lea BoskovicBoskovic – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
