Kaia Kanepi and Richel Hogenkamp will fight against each other in the semifinal of Las Palmas (W25) for the 4th time of their career. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kaia Kanepi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kaia Kanepi is the pick to win this match.
Kaia Kanepi -> 1.24
Richel Hogenkamp -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kaia Kanepi vs. Richel Hogenkamp
This will be the 4th time that Kaia Kanepi and Richel Hogenkamp play each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Kanepi (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Kanepi won 6-3 6-0 in the qualifications in Rabat back in 2016.
Kaia Kanepi
Ranked no. 101, Kaia reached the qualifications after beating Maryna Zanevska 6-2 4-6 7-5, Paula Ormaechea 6-2 4-6 7-5 and Anastasia Zarycka 6-2 6-3.
In the quarter, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Zarytska (6-2 6-3). During the match Kanepi scored 63 points vs Zarytska’s 44. Kanepi was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kanepi recorded 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Kaia Kanepi lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kanepi put 58% of her first serves in, winning 65% (17/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (8/19) on the 2nd serve. Kanepi broke Zarytska 7 times after converting 41% of her break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kanepi has dropped 2 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Kanepi has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 65% of her matches (231-122). 4-1 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Kanepi has a 91-41 match record in the last years on clay.
Her best result of the year was conquering the title in the Cotentin where she defeated Harriet Dart in the final 6-4 6-4 and in the W25 Istanbul where she overcame Vera Zvonareva in the final 6-3 6-3.
Kaia has a 15-5 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Las Palmas (W25)
The Estonian didn’t compete in the Las Palmas (W25) in 2019.
Richel Hogenkamp
Ranked no. 219, Richel reached the qualifications after defeating Katharina Gerlach 6-2 4-6 6-3, Kathinka Von Deichmann 6-4 7-64 and Oksana Selekhmeteva 6-1 6-4.
In the quarter, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Selekhmeteva (6-1 6-4). During the match Hogenkamp scored 64 points vs Selekhmeteva’s 42. Hogenkamp was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Hogenkamp scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Richel Hogenkamp lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Hogenkamp put 59% of her first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Hogenkamp broke Selekhmeteva 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Richel has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Richel has a 10-9 win-loss record in 2020, 6-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kanepi | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 67 |
| Pts | 268-211 | 238-197 |
| Total Points | 479 | 435 |
| Winners | 90 | 83 |
| %Winners | 34% | 35% |
Both Kanepi and Hogenkamp played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Kaia Kanepi conceded 2 sets, while Richel Hogenkamp dropper 1 set. Kanepi has played 1 set more than Hogenkamp (8 vs 7). Therefore, Kanepi played 10 games more than Hogenkamp. The Estonian scored 90 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch scored 83 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kanepi | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 122/211 | 140/212 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 90/122 | 83/140 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 59% |
| 2nd pts | 39/89 | 38/72 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 53% |
Kanepi struck 8 aces (2.7 per match). Hogenkamp bagged 4 aces (1.3 per match). Kanepi won 74% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Hogenkamp won 59% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kanepi | Hogenkamp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 19 |
| Converted | 19/40 | 19/32 |
| % Converted | 48% | 59% |
| Conceded | 18 | 26 |
| Saved | 7 | 15 |
| % Saved | 39% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 11 | 11 |
The Estonian broke her opponents 19 times with a 48% conversion rate. Kaia dropped her serve 11 times and she saved 39% of the break points that she conceded. Richel broke her opponents 19 times with a 59% conversion rate. Hogenkamp conceded her serve 11 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded.
| Kanepi | |||||
| R1 Zanevska |
R2 Ormaechea |
1/4 Zarytska |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | 17 | 77 | |
| pts | 102-82 | 103-85 | 63-44 | 268-211 | |
| Total points | 184 | 188 | 107 | 479 | |
| Winners | 36 | 37 | 17 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% | 27% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 44/82 | 52/84 | 26/45 | 122/211 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 62% | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 36/44 | 37/52 | 17/26 | 90/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 71% | 65% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/38 | 13/32 | 8/19 | 39/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 41% | 42% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 7 | 19 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 7/11 | 7/17 | 19/40 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 64% | 41% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 3/8 | 2/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 38% | 40% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Hogenkamp | |||||
| R1 Gerlach |
R2 Von Deichmann |
1/4 Selekhmeteva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 7-64 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 23 | 17 | 67 | |
| pts | 86-74 | 88-81 | 64-42 | 238-197 | |
| Total points | 160 | 169 | 106 | 435 | |
| Winners | 29 | 35 | 19 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% | 30% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 7 | 2 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 52/75 | 61/91 | 27/46 | 140/212 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 67% | 59% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 29/52 | 35/61 | 19/27 | 83/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 56% | 57% | 70% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 15/30 | 10/19 | 38/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 50% | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 8 | 5 | 6 | 19 | |
| Converted | 8/15 | 5/9 | 6/8 | 19/32 | |
| Converted % | 53% | 56% | 75% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 12 | 4 | 26 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 8/12 | 2/4 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 50% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LLL
Tennis Scores in W25 Las Palmas De Gran Canaria
- Hyeon ChungChung – Jason JungJung (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kaia KanepiKanepi – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
