Roman Safiullin and Sergiy Stakhovsky will play each other in the 2nd round of the Bratislava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roman Safiullin who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roman Safiullin is the pick to win this match.
Roman Safiullin -> 1.25
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 3.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roman Safiullin vs. Sergiy Stakhovsky
There is no head to head record between Roman Safiullin and Sergiy Stakhovsky since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Roman Safiullin
Ranked no. 180, Roman got to the 2nd round after defeating Federico Gaio 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Safiullin had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-3 6-4). During the match Safiullin scored 65 points vs Gaio’s 51. Roman was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Safiullin recorded 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Roman Safiullin lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Safiullin put 59% of his first serves in, winning 90% (26/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Gaio 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Safiullin has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (280-121). 12-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Safiullin has a 41-22 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Safiullin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Cherbourg Challenger.
Safiullin has a 23-11 win-loss record in 2020, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bratislava Challenger
Safiullin capitulated in the 1st round to Gerard Granollers.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 195, Sergiy reached the 2nd round after defeating Lukas Lacko 7-5 7-66.
In the 1st round, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Lacko (7-5 7-66). During the match Stakhovsky scored 90 points vs Lacko’s 77. Stakhovsky was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Stakhovsky fired 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Sergiy Stakhovsky lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Stakhovsky put 60% of his first serves in, winning 90% (38/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. Stakhovsky broke Lacko twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Stakhovsky has a 9-12 win-loss record in 2020, 6-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bratislava Challenger
Stakhovsky lost in the 2nd round to Stefano Travaglia.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Safiullin | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 25 |
| Pts | 65-51 | 90-77 |
| Total Points | 116 | 167 |
| Winners | 26 | 38 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
Both Safiullin and Stakhovsky played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Safiullin and Stakhovsky have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Safiullin played 6 games less than Stakhovsky. Safiullin scored 26 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Sergiy made 38 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Safiullin | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 15 |
| 1st in | 29/49 | 42/70 |
| %1st in | 59% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 38/42 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 12/28 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 43% |
Safiullin recorded 9 aces . Stakhovsky struck 15 aces . Safiullin won 90% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Stakhovsky won 90% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Safiullin | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 40% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Russian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Stakhovsky broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Sergiy conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Safiullin | |||
| R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 65-51 | 65-51 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/49 | 29/49 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 26/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Stakhovsky | |||
| R1 Lacko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 90-77 | 90-77 | |
| Total points | 167 | 167 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 42/70 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 38/42 | 38/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 12/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLWLWLWL
Tennis Scores in Bratislava Challenger
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Quentin HalysHalys (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Sebastian OfnerOfner (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Maxime CressyCressy (2-6 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Steven DiezDiez (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Yannick MadenMaden (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ViolaViola – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (2-6 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Blaz RolaRola – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Julian LenzLenz (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (7-5 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Quentin HalysHalys (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Matteo ViolaViola – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Blaz RolaRola (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
