Jay Clarke and Borna Gojo will square off in the 2nd round of the Istanbul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on LIMAK COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Borna Gojo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Borna Gojo is the pick to win this match.
Borna Gojo -> 1.6
Jay Clarke -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jay Clarke vs. Borna Gojo
There is no head to head record between Jay Clarke and Borna Gojo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jay Clarke
Ranked no. 189, Jay reached the 2nd round after beating Sergiy Stakhovsky 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, Clarke had a good straight sets win against Stakhovsky (6-4 6-0). During the match Clarke scored 62 points vs Stakhovsky’s 37. Jay was exceptionally aggressive to blast 14 winners.
Regarding the service games, Clarke wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Jay Clarke lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Clarke put 41% of his first serves in, winning 70% (14/20) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (20/29) on the 2nd serve. Jay broke Stakhovsky 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Clarke has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (162-107). 4-4 on hard in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Clarke has a 71-41 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Jay’s best result of the year was reaching the semi-finals in the Burnie Challenger.
Clarke has a 5-8 win-loss record in 2020, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Istanbul Challenger
The Brit lost in the 2nd round to Lucas Miedler.
Borna Gojo
Ranked no. 245 (career high), Borna reached the 2nd round after beating Cengiz Aksu 7-5 7-5, Andrea Arnaboldi 6-76 6-3 6-2 and Taro Daniel 2-6 7-64 7-63.
In the 1st round against Daniel, Borna recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-64 7-63).-114) than Daniel. In fact, the world no. 189 won 114 points vs Daniel’s. That means that Gojo was more focused during the important points. Gojo was quite aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo made 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Borna Gojo lost the serve 6 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Gojo put 66% of his first serves in, winning 68% (52/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (16/39) on the 2nd serve. Gojo broke Daniel 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Borna’s best result of the current season was reaching the semi-finals in the Split Challenger.
Borna has a 21-12 win-loss record in 2020, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Istanbul Challenger
Gojo didn’t compete in the Istanbul Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Clarke | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 88 |
| Pts | 62-37 | 289-270 |
| Total Points | 99 | 559 |
| Winners | 14 | 134 |
| %Winners | 23% | 46% |
Clarke played 1 match while Gojo competed in 3 matches. Gojo started his run from the qualifications while Clarke had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Borna Gojo lost 2 sets while Jay Clarke hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Clarke has played 6 set(s) less than Gojo (2 vs 8). Therefore, Clarke played 72 games less than Gojo. The Brit scored 14 winners (23% of the total points). On the other side, The Croatian managed to score 134 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Clarke | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 8.3 |
| 1st in | 20/49 | 176/281 |
| %1st in | 41% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 14/20 | 134/176 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 51/105 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 49% |
Clarke didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gojo bagged 25 aces (8.3 per match). Clarke won 70% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Clarke | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 10 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 10/19 |
| % Converted | 56% | 53% |
| Conceded | 3 | 18 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 67% | 61% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
Jay broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. Gojo conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
| Clarke | |||
| R1 Stakhovsky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 14 | 14 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 23% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 20/49 | 20/49 | |
| % 1st in | 41% | 41% | |
| 1st pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gojo | |||||
| Q1 Aksu |
Q3 Arnaboldi |
R1 Daniel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | 6-76 6-3 6-2 | 2-6 7-64 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 30 | 34 | 88 | |
| pts | 78-76 | 97-76 | 114-118 | 289-270 | |
| Total points | 154 | 173 | 232 | 559 | |
| Winners | 36 | 46 | 52 | 134 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 47% | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 14 | 7 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 3 | 7 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 43/76 | 56/89 | 77/116 | 176/281 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 63% | 66% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 36/43 | 46/56 | 52/77 | 134/176 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 82% | 68% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/33 | 21/33 | 16/39 | 51/105 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 64% | 41% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 10/19 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 60% | 50% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 14 | 18 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 8/14 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 57% | 132% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWW
LWLWLWLLLL Tennis Scores in Istanbul Challenger
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Alexey VatutinVatutin (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-66 6-0) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Taro DanielDaniel (2-6 7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Emilio GomezGomez (6-4 6-76 7-5) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Ergi KirkinKirkin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Marsel IlhanIlhan (6-77 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Denis IstominIstomin (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-2 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KlizanKlizan – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Benjamin BonziBonzi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
