![Prediction And Head To Head Federico Coria Vs. Kimmer Coppejans Ow72bxi4gi Prediction and head to head Federico Coria vs. Kimmer Coppejans](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Federico-Coria-vs.-Kimmer-Coppejans-Ow72Bxi4gi.jpg)
Federico Coria and Kimmer Coppejans will face off in the qualifications of the Forte Village Sardegna Open for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10:00 am on SARDEGNA COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Coria who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Coria is the pick to win this match.
Federico Coria -> 1.6
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Coria vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Coria and Kimmer Coppejans fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Coria (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
Federico Coria
Ranked no. 99, Coria got to the qualifications after beating Matteo Viola 6-2 1-6 7-64.
In the qualifications, Coria defeated Viola (6-2 1-6 7-64).-101) than Viola. In fact, the world no. 99 won 101 points vs Viola’s. That means that Coria was more focused during the important points. Coria was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Coria bagged 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Federico Coria lost the serve 6 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Coria put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 27% (7/26) on the 2nd serve. Coria broke Viola 6 times after converting 33% of his break points (6/18).
Coria has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (416-234). 13-9 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Coria has a 410-219 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Federico has a 16-14 win-loss record in 2020, 13-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Sardinia
Coria didn’t compete in Sardinia in 2019.
Kimmer Coppejans
Ranked no. 163, Kimmer got to the qualifications after defeating Gian Marco Moroni 2-6 7-63 6-0.
In the qualifications against Marco Moroni, The Belgian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-63 6-0). During the match Coppejans scored 95 points vs Marco Moroni’s 86. Kimmer was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 54% of his first serves in, winning 56% (29/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (24/44) on the 2nd serve. Kimmer broke Marco Moroni 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Coppejans’s best result of the year was reaching the semi-finals in the Launceston Challenger.
The Belgian has a 12-12 win-loss record in 2020, 4-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Sardinia
Coppejans didn’t play in Sardinia in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Coria | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 28 | 27 |
Pts | 101-102 | 95-86 |
Total Points | 203 | 181 |
Winners | 34 | 29 |
%Winners | 34% | 31% |
Both Coria and Coppejans played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Federico Coria conceded 1 set, while Kimmer Coppejans dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Coria and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Coria played 1 game more than Coppejans. Coria scored 34 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Coppejans struck 29 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Coria | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 0 |
Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
1st in | 51/77 | 52/96 |
%1st in | 66% | 54% |
1st pts | 34/51 | 29/52 |
%1st pts | 67% | 56% |
2nd pts | 7/26 | 24/44 |
%2nd pts | 27% | 55% |
Coria scored 7 aces . Coppejans didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Coria won 67% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 27% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 56% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Coria | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 6 |
Converted | 6/18 | 6/13 |
% Converted | 33% | 46% |
Conceded | 8 | 12 |
Saved | 2 | 7 |
% Saved | 25% | 58% |
Times Broken | 6 | 5 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Argentine surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
Coria | |||
Q1 Viola |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 1-6 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 101-102 | 101-102 | |
Total points | 203 | 203 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 51/77 | 51/77 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 7/26 | 7/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 27% | 27% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 2/8 | 2 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Coppejans | |||
Q1 Marco Moroni |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 7-63 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 95-86 | 95-86 | |
Total points | 181 | 181 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 52/96 | 52/96 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 29/52 | 29/52 | |
% 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
2nd pts | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Jozef KovalikKovalik (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Sumit NagalNagal (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-0) – H2H and prediction