Frances Tiafoe and Lorenzo Musetti will square off in the 2nd round of the Parma Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lorenzo Musetti who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lorenzo Musetti is the pick to win this match.
Lorenzo Musetti -> 1.57
Frances Tiafoe -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Frances Tiafoe vs. Lorenzo Musetti
This will be the 2nd time that Frances Tiafoe and Lorenzo Musetti clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Musetti (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
Frances Tiafoe
Ranked no. 67, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Blaz Rola 7-61 6-3.
In the 1st round, Tiafoe had a good straight sets win against Rola (7-61 6-3). During the match Tiafoe scored 75 points vs Rola’s 64. Francis was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tiafoe made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Frances Tiafoe was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (35/47) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Francis broke Rola 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Tiafoe has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (223-163). 2-2 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tiafoe has a 81-42 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Tiafoe has a 11-12 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Parma Challenger
Tiafoe didn’t play in the Parma Challenger in 2019.
Lorenzo Musetti
Ranked no. 138 (career high), the Italian reached the 2nd round after beating Federico Gaio 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Lorenzo had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-3 6-2). During the match Musetti scored 58 points vs Gaio’s 38. Lorenzo was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Musetti scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lorenzo Musetti was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 89% (8/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lorenzo broke Gaio 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Musetti’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Forli Challenger.
Musetti has a 26-11 win-loss record in 2020, 17-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Parma Challenger
Musetti lost in the 1st round to Jacopo Berrettini.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Tiafoe | Musetti |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 22 | 17 |
Pts | 75-64 | 58-38 |
Total Points | 139 | 96 |
Winners | 35 | 25 |
%Winners | 47% | 43% |
Both Tiafoe and Musetti played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Tiafoe and Musetti have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Tiafoe played 5 games more than Musetti. The American scored 35 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Musetti recorded 25 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Tiafoe | Musetti |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 1 |
Avg per match | 6 | 1 |
1st in | 47/76 | 31/40 |
%1st in | 62% | 78% |
1st pts | 35/47 | 25/31 |
%1st pts | 74% | 81% |
2nd pts | 15/29 | 8/9 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 89% |
Tiafoe struck 6 aces . Musetti managed to score 1 ace . Tiafoe won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Musetti won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 89% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Tiafoe | Musetti |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 43% | 40% |
Conceded | 8 | 1 |
Saved | 6 | 1 |
% Saved | 75% | 100% |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Tiafoe broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Tiafoe conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Musetti broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Musetti was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Tiafoe | |||
R1 Rola |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-61 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
Total points | 139 | 139 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 47/76 | 47/76 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Musetti | |||
R1 Gaio |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 58-38 | 58-38 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
% 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 8/9 | 8/9 | |
% 2nd pts | 89% | 89% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Parma Challenger
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Blaz RolaRola (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Andreas SeppiSeppi (6-1 7-66) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis IstominIstomin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (1-6 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Maxime CressyCressy (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Hugo GrenierGrenier (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Paolo LorenziLorenzi – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-2 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Jason JungJung (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Taro DanielDaniel (5-7 7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Andreas SeppiSeppi (6-1 7-6(6)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Gianluca MagerMager (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Laslo DjereDjere (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-1) – H2H and prediction