Kiki Bertens and Martina Trevisan will clash against each other in the 4th round of the French Open for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11 am on Court Suzanne LENGLEN. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kiki Bertens who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kiki Bertens is the pick to win this match.
Kiki Bertens -> 1.3
Martina Trevisan -> 3.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kiki Bertens vs. Martina Trevisan
This will be the 2nd time that Kiki Bertens and Martina Trevisan play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Bertens (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
Kiki Bertens
Ranked no. 8, Kiki got to the 4th round after beating Katarina Zavatska 2-6 6-2 6-0, Sara Errani 7-65 3-6 9-7 and Katerina Siniakova 6-2 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Kiki had a good straight sets win against Siniakova (6-2 6-2). During the match Bertens scored 54 points vs Siniakova’s 31. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bertens blasted 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Kiki Bertens lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Bertens put 73% of her first serves in, winning 74% (26/35) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (6/13) on the 2nd serve. Bertens broke Siniakova 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points she played.
Bertens has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of her matches (364-215). 5-2 on clay in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bertens has a 162-62 record in the last years on clay.
Her best result of the year was winning the title in St. Petersburg where she beat Elena Rybakina in the final 6-1 6-3.
Bertens has a 15-5 win-loss record in 2020, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
The Dutch lost in the 2nd round to Viktoria Kuzmova.
Martina Trevisan
Ranked no. 159, the Italian reached the 4th round after beating Sachia Vickery 4-6 6-2 6-3, Asia Muhammad 6-3 6-4, Astra Sharma 6-1 6-1, Camila Giorgi 7-5 3-0 ret., Cori Gauff 4-6 6-2 7-5 and Maria Sakkari 1-6 7-66 6-3.
In the 3rd round against Sakkari, Martina recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-66 6-3). During the match Trevisan scored 102 points vs Sakkari’s 101. The Italian was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Trevisan was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Martina Trevisan lost the serve 9 times and she saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Trevisan put 68% of her first serves in, winning 51% (41/81) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (18/39) on the 2nd serve. Martina broke Sakkari 7 times after converting 78% of her break points (7/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Trevisan has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Trevisan has a 15-8 win-loss record in 2020, 9-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
The Italian lost in the qualifications to Timea Babos.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bertens | Trevisan |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 8 | 13 |
Tot Games | 76 | 119 |
Pts | 270-233 | 423-357 |
Total Points | 503 | 780 |
Winners | 94 | 164 |
%Winners | 35% | 39% |
Bertens played 3 matches while Trevisan competed in 5 matches. Trevisan started her run from the qualifications while Bertens had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Kiki Bertens conceded 2 sets, while Martina Trevisan dropper 3 sets. Bertens has played 5 set(s) less than Trevisan (8 vs 13). Therefore, Bertens played 43 games less than Trevisan. Kiki scored 94 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian recorded 164 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bertens | Trevisan |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 1 |
Avg per match | 2.3 | 0.2 |
1st in | 177/256 | 285/417 |
%1st in | 69% | 68% |
1st pts | 94/177 | 164/285 |
%1st pts | 53% | 58% |
2nd pts | 37/79 | 68/132 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 52% |
Bertens managed to score 7 aces (2.3 per match). Trevisan made 1 ace (0.2 per match). Bertens won 53% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Trevisan won 58% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bertens | Trevisan |
---|---|---|
Won | 25 | 33 |
Converted | 25/50 | 33/50 |
% Converted | 50% | 66% |
Conceded | 34 | 57 |
Saved | 16 | 34 |
% Saved | 47% | 60% |
Times Broken | 18 | 23 |
Kiki broke her opponents 25 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kiki dropped her serve 18 times and she saved 47% of the break points that she conceded. Trevisan broke her opponents 33 times with a 66% conversion rate. The Italian conceded her serve 23 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded.
Bertens | |||||
R1 Zavatska |
R2 Errani |
R3 Siniakova |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-2 6-0 | 7-65 3-6 9-7 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 38 | 16 | 76 | |
pts | 82-69 | 134-133 | 54-31 | 270-233 | |
Total points | 151 | 267 | 85 | 503 | |
Winners | 27 | 41 | 26 | 94 | |
%Winners | 33% | 31% | 48% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 6 | 2 | 11 | |
1st in | 53/78 | 89/130 | 35/48 | 177/256 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | 73% | 69% | |
1st pts | 27/53 | 41/89 | 26/35 | 94/177 | |
% 1st pts | 51% | 46% | 74% | 53% | |
2nd pts | 13/25 | 18/41 | 6/13 | 37/79 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 44% | 46% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 8 | 12 | 5 | 25 | |
Converted | 8/13 | 12/30 | 5/7 | 25/50 | |
Converted % | 62% | 40% | 71% | 50% | |
Conceded | 12 | 19 | 3 | 34 | |
Saved | 7/12 | 7/19 | 2/3 | 16 | |
Saved % | 58% | 37% | 67% | 54% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 12 | 1 | 18 |
Trevisan | ||||||||
Q1 Vickery |
Q2 Muhammad |
Q3 Sharma |
R1 Giorgi |
R2 Gauff |
R3 Sakkari |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-1 | 7-5 3-0 ret. | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | 1-6 7-66 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 19 | 14 | 15 | 30 | 29 | 134 | |
pts | 94-78 | 68-50 | 62-39 | 51-42 | 97-89 | 102-101 | 474-399 | |
Total points | 172 | 118 | 101 | 93 | 186 | 203 | 873 | |
Winners | 35 | 32 | 22 | 24 | 34 | 41 | 188 | |
%Winners | 37% | 47% | 35% | 47% | 35% | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||||||
Aces | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 17 | |
1st in | 60/88 | 44/65 | 35/54 | 33/50 | 65/90 | 81/120 | 318/467 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | 65% | 66% | 72% | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 35/60 | 32/44 | 22/35 | 24/33 | 34/65 | 41/81 | 188/318 | |
% 1st pts | 58% | 73% | 63% | 73% | 52% | 51% | 59% | |
2nd pts | 14/28 | 12/21 | 11/19 | 5/17 | 13/25 | 18/39 | 73/149 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 57% | 58% | 29% | 52% | 46% | 49% | |
Breaks | ||||||||
Won | 8 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 37 | |
Converted | 8/14 | 3/4 | 6/9 | 4/8 | 9/14 | 7/9 | 37/58 | |
Converted % | 57% | 75% | 67% | 50% | 64% | 78% | 64% | |
Conceded | 10 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 20 | 62 | |
Saved | 5/10 | 6/7 | 7/8 | 3/5 | 5/12 | 11/20 | 37 | |
Saved % | 50% | 86% | 88% | 60% | 42% | 55% | 127% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 25 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (7-67 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sofia KeninKenin – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Clara BurelBurel (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (7-5 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Petra MarticMartic (6-75 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Fiona FerroFerro – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (7-67 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Tsvetana PironkovaPironkova (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Elise MertensMertens (1-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Simona HalepHalep – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Maria SakkariSakkari (1-6 7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Kiki BertensBertens – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Eugenie BouchardBouchard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (7-5 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Fiona FerroFerro – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (7-6(7) 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Petra MarticMartic (6-7(5) 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Simona HalepHalep – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Kiki BertensBertens (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Caroline GarciaGarcia (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fiona FerroFerro – Sofia KeninKenin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Shuai ZhangZhang (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-1) – H2H and prediction