![Prediction And Head To Head Cagla Buyukakcay Vs. Natalija Kostic 9e8petlzgb Prediction and head to head Cagla Buyukakcay vs. Natalija Kostic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Cagla-Buyukakcay-vs.-Natalija-Kostic-9e8pETLzGB.jpg)
Cagla Buyukakcay and Natalija Kostic will square off in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10 am on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cagla Buyukakcay who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cagla Buyukakcay is the pick to win this match.
Cagla Buyukakcay -> 1.22
Natalija Kostic -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cagla Buyukakcay vs. Natalija Kostic
There is no head to head record between Cagla Buyukakcay and Natalija Kostic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Cagla Buyukakcay
Ranked no. 174, Cagla reached the qualifications after defeating Lesya Tsurenko 6-2 5-7 6-1.
In the qualifications, Buyukakcay defeated Tsurenko (6-2 5-7 6-1). During the match Buyukakcay scored 106 points vs Tsurenko’s 83. Buyukakcay was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Buyukakcay couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Cagla Buyukakcay lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Buyukakcay put 73% of her first serves in, winning 55% (38/69) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Buyukakcay broke Tsurenko 9 times after converting 56% of her break points (9/16).
Buyukakcay has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (302-256). 5-3 on clay in 2020. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Buyukakcay has a 116-82 record in the last years on clay.
Buyukakcay has a 6-6 win-loss record in 2020, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
The Turk didn’t play at the French Open in 2019.
Natalija Kostic
Ranked no. 202, Kostic got to the qualifications after beating Bibiane Schoofs 6-2 5-7 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kostic defeated Schoofs (6-2 5-7 6-3). During the match Kostic scored 110 points vs Schoofs’s 99. The Serbian was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Kostic fired 3 aces and she was not very consistent on her 2nd serve to score 13 double faults. Natalija Kostic lost the serve 6 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Kostic put 59% of her first serves in, winning 64% (45/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (18/48) on the 2nd serve. Natalija broke Schoofs 8 times after converting 57% of her break points (8/14).
The Serbian has a 3-8 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year at the French Open
Kostic didn’t play at the French Open in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Buyukakcay | Kostic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 27 | 29 |
Pts | 106-83 | 110-99 |
Total Points | 189 | 209 |
Winners | 38 | 45 |
%Winners | 36% | 41% |
Both Buyukakcay and Kostic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Cagla Buyukakcay conceded 1 set, while Natalija Kostic dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Buyukakcay and Kostic have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Buyukakcay played 2 games less than Kostic. Buyukakcay scored 38 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Kostic struck 45 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Buyukakcay | Kostic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 3 |
Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
1st in | 69/94 | 70/118 |
%1st in | 73% | 59% |
1st pts | 38/69 | 45/70 |
%1st pts | 55% | 64% |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 18/48 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 38% |
Buyukakcay didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kostic fired 3 aces . Buyukakcay won 55% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Kostic won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Buyukakcay | Kostic |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 8 |
Converted | 9/16 | 8/14 |
% Converted | 56% | 57% |
Conceded | 13 | 16 |
Saved | 7 | 10 |
% Saved | 54% | 63% |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Buyukakcay broke her opponent 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Cagla conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 54% of the break points that she conceded. The Serbian broke her opponent 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Natalija conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded.
Buyukakcay | |||
Q1 Tsurenko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 106-83 | 106-83 | |
Total points | 189 | 189 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 69/94 | 69/94 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 38/69 | 38/69 | |
% 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
2nd pts | 11/25 | 11/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 9 | 9 | |
Converted | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
Saved | 7/13 | 7 | |
Saved % | 54% | 54% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Kostic | |||
Q1 Schoofs |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 110-99 | 110-99 | |
Total points | 209 | 209 | |
Winners | 45 | 45 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 13 | 13 | |
1st in | 70/118 | 70/118 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 45/70 | 45/70 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 18/48 | 18/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 8 | 8 | |
Converted | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
Saved | 10/16 | 10 | |
Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Victoria KanKan (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Reka-Luca JaniJani (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Leonie KungKung – Dalila JakupovicJakupovic (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Clara TausonTauson – Gabriela TalabaTalaba (7-64 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Antonia LottnerLottner (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara – Tereza MrdezaMrdeza (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Allie KiickKiick (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Samantha MurrayMurray (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Irina RamialisonRamialison (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Audrey AlbieAlbie (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Magdalena FrechFrech (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ankita RainaRaina – Jovana JovicJovic (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Barbara HaasHaas – Daria SnigurSnigur (6-0 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Ann LiLi – Indy De VroomeDe Vroome (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Jana CepelovaCepelova (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Natalia VikhlyantsevaVikhlyantseva (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Anastasiya KomardinaKomardina (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez – Jessika PonchetPonchet (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Gabriela CeCe (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Xin Yu WangYu Wang – Robin AndersonAnderson (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sara ErraniErrani – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Jana FettFett (6-0 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Richel HogenkampHogenkamp – Kristina KucovaKucova (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mayo HibiHibi – Caroline DolehideDolehide (3-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Monica NiculescuNiculescu – Chihiro MuramatsuMuramatsu (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Sachia VickeryVickery (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Isabella ShinikovaShinikova (6-1 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone – Selena JanicijevicJanicijevic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Natalija KosticKostic – Bibiane SchoofsSchoofs (6-2 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (6-2 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Kurumi NaraNara – Aubane DroguetDroguet (7-63 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Laura-Ioana PaarPaar – Margot YerolymosYerolymos (1-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Mihaela BuzarnescuBuzarnescu (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Valeria SavinykhSavinykh (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo – Marina MelnikovaMelnikova (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Cristina BucsaBucsa (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ann LiLi – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Laura-Ioana AndreiAndrei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Kurumi NaraNara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulia Gatto-MonticoneGatto-Monticone – Carole MonnetMonnet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva Guerrero AlvarezGuerrero Alvarez – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Richel HogenkampHogenkamp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivana JorovicJorovic – Mayo HibiHibi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Jaqueline CristianCristian (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Yuki NaitoNaito (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Asia MuhammadMuhammad – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Barbara HaasHaas (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Arina RodionovaRodionova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elitsa KostovaKostova – Monica NiculescuNiculescu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniela SeguelSeguel – Leonie KungKung (1-0) – H2H and prediction