![Prediction And Head To Head Mikael Ymer Vs. Facundo Bagnis Bwpg4ozft7 Prediction and head to head Mikael Ymer vs. Facundo Bagnis](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Mikael-Ymer-vs.-Facundo-Bagnis-bWpg4ozFt7.jpg)
Mikael Ymer and Facundo Bagnis will square off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12 pm on Court 6. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Bagnis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Bagnis is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Bagnis -> 1.8
Mikael Ymer -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mikael Ymer vs. Facundo Bagnis
This will be the 2nd time that Mikael Ymer and Facundo Bagnis face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Ymer (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
Mikael Ymer
Ranked no. 71, Ymer reached the qualifications after defeating Marcos Giron 4-6 7-5 7-66 and Marc Polmans 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ymer had a good straight sets win against Polmans (6-4 6-4). During the match Ymer scored 80 points vs Polmans’s 73. Mikael was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ymer managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mikael Ymer lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Ymer put 64% of his first serves in, winning 65% (34/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Ymer broke Polmans 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mikael has surrendered 1 set in this event to win 50% of the points he played.
Ymer has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (209-102). 2-0 on clay in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ymer has a 85-46 record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Swede has a 12-8 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
The Swede didn’t compete in Rome in 2019.
Facundo Bagnis
Ranked no. 134, Facundo got to the qualifications after defeating Tommy Paul 7-5 6-4 and James Duckworth 7-64 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Duckworth (7-64 6-1). During the match Bagnis scored 74 points vs Duckworth’s 55. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Bagnis scored 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Facundo Bagnis lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Bagnis put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (11/17) on the 2nd serve. Facundo broke Duckworth 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Facundo hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Argentine has a 14-9 win-loss record in 2020, 13-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
The Argentine didn’t play in Rome in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ymer | Bagnis |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
Tot Games | 55 | 42 |
Pts | 195-193 | 146-116 |
Total Points | 388 | 262 |
Winners | 68 | 57 |
%Winners | 35% | 39% |
Both Ymer and Bagnis played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mikael Ymer conceded 1 set while Facundo Bagnis hasn’t dropped a set so far. Ymer has played 1 set more than Bagnis (5 vs 4). Therefore, Ymer played 13 games more than Bagnis. Mikael scored 68 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine bagged 57 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ymer | Bagnis |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 10 |
Avg per match | 4.5 | 5 |
1st in | 105/200 | 81/125 |
%1st in | 53% | 65% |
1st pts | 68/105 | 57/81 |
%1st pts | 65% | 70% |
2nd pts | 45/95 | 27/44 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 61% |
Ymer blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Bagnis scored 10 aces (5 per match). Ymer won 65% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Bagnis won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ymer | Bagnis |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 8 |
Converted | 10/17 | 8/14 |
% Converted | 59% | 57% |
Conceded | 20 | 7 |
Saved | 12 | 4 |
% Saved | 60% | 57% |
Times Broken | 8 | 3 |
Mikael broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Ymer conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Facundo broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
Ymer | ||||
Q1 Giron |
Q2 Polmans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-5 7-66 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 20 | 55 | |
pts | 115-120 | 80-73 | 195-193 | |
Total points | 235 | 153 | 388 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | 68 | |
%Winners | 30% | 43% | 35% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 10 | 4 | 14 | |
1st in | 53/119 | 52/81 | 105/200 | |
% 1st in | 45% | 64% | 53% | |
1st pts | 34/53 | 34/52 | 68/105 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 31/66 | 14/29 | 45/95 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 48% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 4/7 | 10/17 | |
Converted % | 60% | 57% | 59% | |
Conceded | 11 | 9 | 20 | |
Saved | 5/11 | 7/9 | 12 | |
Saved % | 45% | 78% | 62% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 2 | 8 |
Bagnis | ||||
Q1 Paul |
Q2 Duckworth |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | 7-64 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 20 | 42 | |
pts | 72-61 | 74-55 | 146-116 | |
Total points | 133 | 129 | 262 | |
Winners | 29 | 28 | 57 | |
%Winners | 40% | 38% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 9 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 41/68 | 40/57 | 81/125 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 70% | 65% | |
1st pts | 29/41 | 28/40 | 57/81 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 16/27 | 11/17 | 27/44 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 65% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 5/10 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 75% | 50% | 57% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 3/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 50% | 60% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Rome
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Leonardo MayerMayer (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Hugo DellienDellien (7-67 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Yuichi SugitaSugita (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – James DuckworthDuckworth (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Matteo ViolaViola (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-72 6-3 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Aljaz BedeneBedene (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Taro DanielDaniel (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Steven DiezDiez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Tommy RobredoRobredo (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gilles SimonSimon (7-5 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-76 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Bradley KlahnKlahn (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Jeremy ChardyChardy (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Alexander BublikBublik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido PellaPella – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Gianluca MagerMager (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Jannik SinnerSinner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Joao SousaSousa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Christian GarinGarin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Casper RuudRuud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction