Tennys Sandgren and Joao Sousa will face off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.52
Joao Sousa -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Joao Sousa
This will be the 2nd time that Tennys Sandgren and Joao Sousa play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sousa (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
Tennys Sandgren
Ranked no. 48, Sandgren reached the qualifications after defeating Alexei Popyrin 6-76 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Popyrin, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 6-4 6-2). During the match Sandgren scored 102 points vs Popyrin’s 81. Tennys was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sandgren fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Tennys Sandgren was pretty efficent on serve to win 71% (36/51) of his 1st serve and 78% (28/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Sandgren broke Popyrin 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Sandgren has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (331-217). 1-0 on clay in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sandgren has a 76-53 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The American has a 8-6 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
The American didn’t play in Rome in 2019.
Joao Sousa
Ranked no. 68, Sousa got to the qualifications after defeating Luciano Darderi 3-6 6-3 6-1 and Ilya Ivashka 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications, Sousa had a good straight sets win against Ivashka (6-4 7-63). During the match Sousa scored 87 points vs Ivashka’s 78. The Portuguese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Sousa bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Joao Sousa lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sousa put 55% of his first serves in, winning 63% (27/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the 2nd serve. Sousa broke Ivashka 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Portuguese has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Sousa has a 3-8 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Rome
The Portuguese had to surrender in the 2nd round to Roger Federer.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Sousa |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 48 |
| Pts | 102-81 | 181-159 |
| Total Points | 183 | 340 |
| Winners | 36 | 60 |
| %Winners | 35% | 33% |
Sandgren played 1 match while Sousa competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Tennys Sandgren conceded 1 set, while Joao Sousa dropper 1 set. Sandgren has played 2 set(s) less than Sousa (3 vs 5). Therefore, Sandgren played 17 games less than Sousa. Sandgren scored 36 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Sousa recorded 60 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Sousa |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 51/87 | 91/162 |
| %1st in | 59% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 36/51 | 60/91 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 28/36 | 44/71 |
| %2nd pts | 78% | 62% |
Sandgren recorded 4 aces . Sousa made 7 aces (3.5 per match). Sandgren won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Sousa won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Sousa |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 8/25 |
| % Converted | 56% | 32% |
| Conceded | 5 | 14 |
| Saved | 3 | 10 |
| % Saved | 60% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Sandgren broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Sousa broke his opponents 8 times with a 32% conversion rate. Sousa conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sandgren | |||
| Q2 Popyrin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 102-81 | 102-81 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 51/87 | 51/87 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 36/51 | 36/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/36 | 28/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sousa | ||||
| Q1 Darderi |
Q2 Ivashka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 23 | 48 | |
| pts | 94-81 | 87-78 | 181-159 | |
| Total points | 175 | 165 | 340 | |
| Winners | 33 | 27 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 31% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 48/84 | 43/78 | 91/162 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 55% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 33/48 | 27/43 | 60/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 63% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/36 | 20/35 | 44/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 57% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/14 | 8/25 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 29% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 4/7 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 57% | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LWWLLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Rome
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-76 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Hugo DellienDellien (7-67 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Taro DanielDaniel (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Steven DiezDiez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Tommy RobredoRobredo (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Aljaz BedeneBedene (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Bradley KlahnKlahn (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao SousaSousa – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Jeremy ChardyChardy (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Leonardo MayerMayer (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gilles SimonSimon (7-5 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Yuichi SugitaSugita (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – James DuckworthDuckworth (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Matteo ViolaViola (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-72 6-3 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Alexander BublikBublik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido PellaPella – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Milos RaonicRaonic – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Gianluca MagerMager (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Jannik SinnerSinner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Joao SousaSousa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Federico CoriaCoria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Christian GarinGarin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Casper RuudRuud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
