Maryna Zanevska and Francesca Jones will fight against each other in the semifinal of Tarvisio (W25) for the 1st time in their career. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francesca Jones who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Francesca Jones is the pick to win this match.
Francesca Jones -> 1.71
Maryna Zanevska -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maryna Zanevska vs. Francesca Jones
There is no head to head record between Maryna Zanevska and Francesca Jones since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Maryna Zanevska
Ranked no. 319, the Belgian got to the semifinal after beating Lucia Bronzetti 6-3 4-6 6-4, Dalila Spiteri 7-5 6-2 and Marie Benoit 3-6 6-4 7-5.
In the quarter against Benoit, Maryna recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-5). During the match Zanevska scored 103 points vs Benoit’s 94. Zanevska was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zanevska scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and she committed only 8 double faults. Maryna Zanevska lost the serve 8 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Zanevska put 66% of her first serves in, winning 62% (44/71) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (12/36) on the 2nd serve. Maryna broke Benoit 8 times after converting 57% of her break points (8/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Maryna has surrendered 2 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points she played.
Zanevska has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of her matches (320-199). 6-1 on clay in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Zanevska has a 147-91 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Belgian has a 6-1 win-loss record in 2020, 6-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Tarvisio (W25)
Maryna didn’t play in the Tarvisio (W25) in 2019.
Francesca Jones
Ranked no. 321, Jones got to the semifinal after beating Zaklin Bokan 6-0 6-0, Martina Colmegna 6-2 6-4, Katharina Gerlach 6-0 7-5, Nicole Fossa Huergo 6-1 6-2 and Lea Boskovic 6-4 6-1.
In the quarter, Francesca had a good straight sets win against Boskovic (6-4 6-1). During the match Jones scored 61 points vs Boskovic’s 37. Jones was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Jones bagged 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Francesca Jones was pretty effective on serve to win 83% (25/30) of her 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Boskovic 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jones hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points she played.
Jones’s best result of the year was getting to the semi-finals in the W25 Jodhpur.
Francesca has a 16-5 win-loss record in 2020, 10-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Tarvisio (W25)
Jones didn’t play in the Tarvisio (W25) in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zanevska | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 80 | 80 |
| Pts | 272-233 | 270-182 |
| Total Points | 505 | 452 |
| Winners | 105 | 96 |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% |
Zanevska played 3 matches while Jones competed in 5 matches. Jones started her run from the qualifications while Zanevska had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Maryna Zanevska lost 2 sets while Francesca Jones hasn’t conceded a set so far. Zanevska has played 2 set(s) less than Jones (8 vs 10). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (80). Zanevska scored 105 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Francesca blasted 96 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zanevska | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| 1st in | 163/266 | 132/203 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 105/163 | 96/132 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 43/103 | 38/71 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 54% |
Zanevska bagged 2 aces (0.7 per match). Jones struck 2 aces (0.4 per match). Zanevska won 64% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Jones won 73% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zanevska | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 20 | 22 |
| Converted | 20/29 | 22/42 |
| % Converted | 69% | 52% |
| Conceded | 32 | 18 |
| Saved | 16 | 12 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 16 | 6 |
Maryna broke her opponents 20 times with a 69% conversion rate. The Belgian lost her serve 16 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Brit broke her opponents 22 times with a 52% conversion rate. The Brit conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zanevska | |||||
| R1 Bronzetti |
R2 Spiteri |
1/4 Benoit |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | 7-5 6-2 | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 | 31 | 80 | |
| pts | 96-85 | 73-54 | 103-94 | 272-233 | |
| Total points | 181 | 127 | 197 | 505 | |
| Winners | 35 | 26 | 44 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | 43% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 8 | 8 | 26 | |
| 1st in | 56/94 | 36/65 | 71/107 | 163/266 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 55% | 66% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 35/56 | 26/36 | 44/71 | 105/163 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 72% | 62% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/38 | 13/29 | 12/36 | 43/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 45% | 33% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 8 | 20 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/7 | 8/14 | 20/29 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 86% | 57% | 69% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 9 | 13 | 32 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 6/9 | 5/13 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 38% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 | 8 | 16 | |
| Jones | |||||||
| Q1 Bokan |
Q3 Colmegna |
R1 Gerlach |
R2 Fossa Huergo |
1/4 Boskovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-0 7-5 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 18 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 80 | |
| pts | – | 66-47 | 87-66 | 56-32 | 61-37 | 270-182 | |
| Total points | 0 | 113 | 153 | 88 | 98 | 452 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | 23 | 25 | 96 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 36% | 28% | 41% | 41% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 19 | ||
| 1st in | / | 32/57 | 43/68 | 27/37 | 30/41 | 132/203 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 56% | 63% | 73% | 73% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | / | 24/32 | 24/43 | 23/27 | 25/30 | 96/132 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 75% | 56% | 85% | 83% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 10/25 | 15/25 | 5/10 | 8/11 | 38/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 40% | 60% | 50% | 73% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 22 | ||
| Converted | / | 6/10 | 7/16 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 22/42 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 60% | 44% | 56% | 57% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 18 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 5/8 | 6/9 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 12 | |
| Saved % | – | 63% | 67% | – | 100% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWLW Tennis Scores in W25 Tarvisio
- Federica Di SarraDi Sarra – Julia GrabherGrabher (7-66 7-63) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Marie BenoitBenoit (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
