Qinwen Zheng and Alina Charaeva will fight against each other in the final of Marbella (W25) for the 1st time in their career. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Qinwen Zheng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Qinwen Zheng is the pick to win this match.
Qinwen Zheng -> 1.36
Alina Charaeva -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Qinwen Zheng vs. Alina Charaeva
There is no head to head record between Qinwen Zheng and Alina Charaeva since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Qinwen Zheng
Ranked no. 617 (career high), the Chinese reached the final after beating Lucrezia Stefanini 6-2 6-3, Lexie Stevens 6-3 6-1, Oksana Selekhmeteva 6-1 6-3 and Aneta Laboutkova 6-2 6-1.
In the semifinal, Qinwen had a good straight sets win against Laboutkova (6-2 6-1). During the match Zheng scored 54 points vs Laboutkova’s 31. Zheng was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zheng fired 4 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Qinwen Zheng lost the serve once. Furthermore, Zheng put 50% of her first serves in, winning 91% (20/22) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Qinwen broke Laboutkova 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zheng hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 60% of the points she played.
Zheng has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 66% of her matches (61-32). 13-1 on clay in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Zheng has a 21-7 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The Chinese has a 16-4 win-loss record in 2020, 13-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Marbella (W25)
Zheng didn’t play in the Marbella (W25) in 2019.
Alina Charaeva
Ranked no. 734, the Russian reached the final after beating Maria Lota Kaul 6-2 6-1, Clara Burel 6-4 3-6 6-4, Miriam Bianca Bulgaru 7-5 7-5 and Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers 6-1 6-4.
In the semifinal, Charaeva had a good straight sets win against Cavalle-Reimers (6-1 6-4). During the match Charaeva scored 71 points vs Cavalle-Reimers’s 55. Alina was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Charaeva scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 7 double faults. Alina Charaeva lost the serve once and she saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Charaeva put 59% of her first serves in, winning 62% (28/45) of the points behind her 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. Alina broke Cavalle-Reimers 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Alina has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Charaeva’s best result of the season was reaching the semi-finals in the W25 Kazan and the W25 Marbella.
Charaeva has a 9-4 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Marbella (W25)
Charaeva didn’t play in the Marbella (W25) in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zheng | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 64 | 85 |
| Pts | 230-152 | 331-278 |
| Total Points | 382 | 609 |
| Winners | 80 | 121 |
| %Winners | 35% | 37% |
Both Zheng and Charaeva played 4 matches. At the moment, Alina Charaeva conceded 1 set while Qinwen Zheng hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Zheng has played 1 set(s) less than Charaeva (8 vs 9). Therefore, Zheng played 21 games less than Charaeva. Qinwen scored 80 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Charaeva struck 121 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zheng | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1.8 |
| 1st in | 93/199 | 182/323 |
| %1st in | 47% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 80/93 | 121/182 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 50/106 | 60/141 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 43% |
Zheng fired 16 aces (4 per match). Charaeva scored 7 aces (1.8 per match). Zheng won 86% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Charaeva won 66% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zheng | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 20 | 23 |
| Converted | 20/28 | 23/48 |
| % Converted | 71% | 48% |
| Conceded | 11 | 44 |
| Saved | 7 | 31 |
| % Saved | 64% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 13 |
Zheng broke her opponents 20 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded. Charaeva broke her opponents 23 times with a 48% conversion rate. Charaeva conceded her serve 13 times and she saved 70% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zheng | ||||||
| R1 Stefanini |
R2 Stevens |
1/4 Selekhmeteva |
1/2 Laboutkova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 64 | |
| pts | 55-41 | 59-36 | 62-44 | 54-31 | 230-152 | |
| Total points | 96 | 95 | 106 | 85 | 382 | |
| Winners | 17 | 16 | 27 | 20 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 27% | 44% | 37% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 18 | |
| 1st in | 18/46 | 21/51 | 32/58 | 22/44 | 93/199 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 41% | 55% | 50% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 17/18 | 16/21 | 27/32 | 20/22 | 80/93 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 76% | 84% | 91% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 18/30 | 9/26 | 10/22 | 50/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 60% | 35% | 45% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 5/8 | 20/28 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 83% | 83% | 63% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 3/4 | 4/5 | 0/1 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 75% | 80% | 0% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Charaeva | ||||||
| R1 Lota |
R2 Burel |
1/4 Bianca |
1/2 Cavalle-Reimers |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | 7-5 7-5 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 29 | 24 | 17 | 85 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 101-101 | 95-82 | 71-55 | 331-278 | |
| Total points | 104 | 202 | 177 | 126 | 609 | |
| Winners | 23 | 40 | 30 | 28 | 121 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 40% | 32% | 39% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 37 | |
| 1st in | 31/58 | 59/101 | 47/88 | 45/76 | 182/323 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 58% | 53% | 59% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 40/59 | 30/47 | 28/45 | 121/182 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 68% | 64% | 62% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 13/42 | 20/41 | 17/31 | 60/141 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 31% | 49% | 55% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 23 | |
| Converted | 7/8 | 6/18 | 6/13 | 4/9 | 23/48 | |
| Converted % | 88% | 33% | 46% | 44% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 16 | 11 | 12 | 44 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 10/16 | 7/11 | 11/12 | 31 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 63% | 64% | 92% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 13 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWL
LLLLWWWWLW Tennis Scores in W25 Marbella
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Lloyd HarrisHarris (4-6 6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Alina CharaevaCharaeva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
