Qinwen Zheng and Oksana Selekhmeteva will fight against each other in the quarter of Marbella (W25) for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10.30 am on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Qinwen Zheng who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Qinwen Zheng is the pick to win this match.
Qinwen Zheng -> 1.39
Oksana Selekhmeteva -> 2.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Qinwen Zheng vs. Oksana Selekhmeteva
There is no head to head record between Qinwen Zheng and Oksana Selekhmeteva since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Qinwen Zheng
Ranked no. 617 (career high), the Chinese reached the quarter after defeating Lucrezia Stefanini 6-2 6-3 and Lexie Stevens 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Qinwen had a good straight sets win against Stevens (6-3 6-1). During the match Zheng scored 59 points vs Stevens’s 36. Zheng was pretty aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zheng made 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Qinwen Zheng was quite efficent on serve to win 76% (16/21) of her 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The Chinese broke Stevens 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zheng hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 60% of the points she played.
Qinwen has a 14-4 win-loss record in 2020, 11-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Marbella (W25)
The Chinese didn’t play in the Marbella (W25) in 2019.
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Ranked no. 748, Oksana got to the quarter after defeating Celine Simunyu 6-0 6-3, Tamira Paszek 6-4 2-6 10-5, Ana Lantigua De La Nuez 6-4 6-1 and Rosa Vicens Mas 6-4 6-0.
In the 2nd round, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Vicens Mas (6-4 6-0). During the match Selekhmeteva scored 64 points vs Vicens Mas’s 41. Oksana was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Selekhmeteva wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Oksana Selekhmeteva lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Selekhmeteva put 74% of her first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. Selekhmeteva broke Vicens Mas 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Russian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Oksana has a 9-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Marbella (W25)
Selekhmeteva didn’t play in the Marbella (W25) in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zheng | Selekhmeteva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 76 |
| Pts | 114-77 | 221-177 |
| Total Points | 191 | 398 |
| Winners | 33 | 87 |
| %Winners | 29% | 39% |
Zheng played 2 matches while Selekhmeteva competed in 4 matches. Selekhmeteva started her run from the qualifications while Zheng had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Oksana Selekhmeteva conceded 1 set while Qinwen Zheng hasn’t dropped a set so far. Zheng has played 5 set(s) less than Selekhmeteva (4 vs 9). Therefore, Zheng played 43 games less than Selekhmeteva. Zheng scored 33 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Selekhmeteva made 87 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zheng | Selekhmeteva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 0.3 |
| 1st in | 39/97 | 137/188 |
| %1st in | 40% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 87/137 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 31/58 | 25/51 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 49% |
Zheng bagged 8 aces (4 per match). Selekhmeteva bagged 1 ace (0.3 per match). Zheng won 85% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Selekhmeteva won 64% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zheng | Selekhmeteva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 13 |
| Converted | 10/14 | 13/28 |
| % Converted | 71% | 46% |
| Conceded | 5 | 23 |
| Saved | 3 | 17 |
| % Saved | 60% | 74% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Chinese broke her opponents 10 times with a 71% conversion rate. Zheng lost her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. The Russian broke her opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Russian conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 74% of the break points that she conceded.
| Zheng | ||||
| R1 Stefanini |
R2 Stevens |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 | 33 | |
| pts | 55-41 | 59-36 | 114-77 | |
| Total points | 96 | 95 | 191 | |
| Winners | 17 | 16 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 27% | 29% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 18/46 | 21/51 | 39/97 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 41% | 40% | |
| 1st pts | 17/18 | 16/21 | 33/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 76% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 18/30 | 31/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 60% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/6 | 10/14 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 83% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Selekhmeteva | ||||||
| Q2 Simunyu |
Q3 Paszek |
R1 Lantigua De La |
R2 Vicens |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 6-4 2-6 10-5 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 28 | 17 | 16 | 76 | |
| pts | – | 84-81 | 73-55 | 64-41 | 221-177 | |
| Total points | 0 | 165 | 128 | 105 | 398 | |
| Winners | 33 | 28 | 26 | 87 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 39% | 38% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | / | 56/82 | 41/52 | 40/54 | 137/188 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 68% | 79% | 74% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | / | 33/56 | 28/41 | 26/40 | 87/137 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 59% | 68% | 65% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 13/26 | 6/11 | 6/14 | 25/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 50% | 55% | 43% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | ||
| Converted | / | 2/7 | 5/13 | 6/8 | 13/28 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 29% | 38% | 75% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 6 | 5 | 23 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 9/12 | 5/6 | 3/5 | 17 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 83% | 60% | 109% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWL
LLWWLLLLWW Tennis Scores in W25 Marbella
- Julian OcleppoOcleppo – John LambleLamble (7-62 6-71 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jeremy BealeBeale (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Aneta LaboutkovaLaboutkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivonne Cavalle-ReimersCavalle-Reimers – Alice RameRame (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alina CharaevaCharaeva – Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru (0-0) – H2H and prediction
