Tallon Griekspoor and Steven Diez will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Ostrava Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11 am on Court 6. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.36
Steven Diez -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Steven Diez
This will be the 2nd time that Tallon Griekspoor and Steven Diez square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Griekspoor (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
Tallon Griekspoor
Ranked no. 150 (career high), Tallon got to the 2nd round after defeating Robin Haase 4-6 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round against Haase, Griekspoor recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-63). During the match Griekspoor scored 121 points vs Haase’s 112. Tallon was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Griekspoor recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Griekspoor put 62% of his first serves in, winning 66% (45/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (22/41) on the 2nd serve. Tallon broke Haase 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Griekspoor has a weak record in the last 6 years having won 35% of his matches (299-163). 9-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Griekspoor has a 213-122 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Tallon’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Prague II Challenger.
Tallon has a 15-6 win-loss record in 2020, 9-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
The Dutch didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
Steven Diez
Ranked no. 171, Diez got to the 2nd round after defeating Rudolf Molleker 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Diez had a good straight sets win against Molleker (6-1 6-2). During the match Diez scored 57 points vs Molleker’s 29. The Canadian was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Diez scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Steven Diez lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Diez put 67% of his first serves in, winning 71% (17/24) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. Steven broke Molleker 7 times after converting 50% of his break points (7/14).
Diez has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (1100-683). 1-2 on clay in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Diez has a 404-268 record in the last 10 years on clay.
Steven has a 3-9 win-loss record in 2020, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Ostrava Challenger
Steven didn’t play in the Ostrava Challenger in 2019.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 15 |
| Pts | 121-112 | 57-29 |
| Total Points | 233 | 86 |
| Winners | 45 | 17 |
| %Winners | 37% | 30% |
Both Griekspoor and Diez played 1 match. At the moment, Tallon Griekspoor dropped 1 set while Steven Diez hasn’t dropped a set so far. Griekspoor has played 1 set more than Diez (3 vs 2). Therefore, Griekspoor played 18 games more than Diez. The Dutch scored 45 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Diez scored 17 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 1 |
| 1st in | 68/109 | 24/36 |
| %1st in | 62% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 45/68 | 17/24 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 22/41 | 6/12 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 50% |
Griekspoor scored 7 aces . Diez managed to score 1 ace . Griekspoor won 66% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Diez won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 42% | 50% |
| Conceded | 13 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 1 |
| % Saved | 62% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Griekspoor broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Tallon lost his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Steven broke his opponent 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Steven conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | |||
| R1 Haase |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 121-112 | 121-112 | |
| Total points | 233 | 233 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 68/109 | 68/109 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 45/68 | 45/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/41 | 22/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/13 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 62% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Diez | |||
| R1 Molleker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 57-29 | 57-29 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 17/24 | 17/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLWWW
LWWWWWWLLL Tennis Scores in Ostrava Challenger
- Lukas RosolRosol – Hyeon ChungChung (2-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Aleksandar VukicVukic (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Robin HaaseHaase (4-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Filip HoranskyHoransky (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Renzo OlivoOlivo (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Martin KlizanKlizan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Steven DiezDiez – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Lukas RosolRosol (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
