Marta Kostyuk and Laura-Ioana Paar will square off in the qualifications of the Palermo Ladies Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 6 pm on Court 12. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction and head to head Marta Kostyuk vs. Laura-Ioana Paar
There is no head to head record between Marta Kostyuk and Laura-Ioana Paar since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marta Kostyuk
Ranked no. 141, Marta reached the qualifications after defeating Daniela Seguel 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Marta had a good straight sets win against Seguel (6-1 6-2). During the match Kostyuk scored 59 points vs Seguel’s 40. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kostyuk couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Marta Kostyuk lost the serve 3 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Kostyuk put 52% of her first serves in, winning 68% (17/25) of the points behind her 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Seguel 7 times after converting 70% of her break points (7/10).
Kostyuk has a unfavourable record in the last 5 years having won 28% of her matches (144-56). 1-0 on clay in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kostyuk has a 97-44 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Marta has a 10-4 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Palermo
Kostyuk didn’t play in Palermo in 2019.
Laura-Ioana Paar
Ranked no. 203, Laura-Ioana got to the qualifications after defeating Bibiane Schoofs 6-2 1-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Laura-Ioana defeated Schoofs (6-2 1-6 6-2).-73) than Schoofs. In fact, the world no. 141 won 73 points vs Schoofs’s. That means that Andrei was more focused during the important points. Andrei was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Andrei was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 8 double faults. Laura-Ioana Paar lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Andrei put 68% of her first serves in, winning 58% (32/55) of the points behind her 1st serve and 35% (9/26) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Schoofs 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Andrei has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of her matches (595-360). 1-0 on clay in 2020. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Andrei has a 321-161 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Laura-Ioana has a 10-6 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Palermo
The Romanian didn’t compete in Palermo in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kostyuk | Andrei |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 15 | 23 |
Pts | 59-40 | 73-75 |
Total Points | 99 | 148 |
Winners | 17 | 32 |
%Winners | 29% | 44% |
Both Kostyuk and Andrei played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Laura-Ioana Paar dropped 1 set while Marta Kostyuk hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kostyuk has played 1 set(s) less than Andrei (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kostyuk played 8 games less than Andrei. Marta scored 17 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Laura-Ioana bagged 32 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kostyuk | Andrei |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 0 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
1st in | 25/48 | 55/81 |
%1st in | 52% | 68% |
1st pts | 17/25 | 32/55 |
%1st pts | 68% | 58% |
2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/26 |
%2nd pts | 39% | 35% |
Kostyuk didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Andrei also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kostyuk won 68% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Andrei won 58% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 35% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kostyuk | Andrei |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 6 |
Converted | 7/10 | 6/13 |
% Converted | 70% | 46% |
Conceded | 4 | 11 |
Saved | 1 | 6 |
% Saved | 25% | 55% |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Kostyuk broke her opponent 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. Marta conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded. Laura-Ioana broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Andrei conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded.
Kostyuk | |||
Q1 Seguel |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 59-40 | 59-40 | |
Total points | 99 | 99 | |
Winners | 17 | 17 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 25/48 | 25/48 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 17/25 | 17/25 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
Converted % | 70% | 70% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 200 |
Andrei | |||
Q1 Schoofs |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 73-75 | 73-75 | |
Total points | 148 | 148 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
1st in | 55/81 | 55/81 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 32/55 | 32/55 | |
% 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
2nd pts | 9/26 | 9/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 400 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Palermo
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (6-3 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Oceane DodinDodin – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (6-2 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Laura-Ioana PaarPaar – Aliona BolsovaBolsova (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova (6-4 4-6 3-5) – See score progression
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Oceane DodinDodin – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (6-2 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure (6-3 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Kaja JuvanJuvan (0-0) – See H2H details
- Laura-Ioana AndreiAndrei – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-0) – See H2H details
- Lara ArruabarrenaArruabarrena – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (1-1) – See H2H details
- Oceane DodinDodin – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-1) – See H2H details
- Petra MarticMartic – Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck (1-0) – See H2H details
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (1-2) – See H2H details
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (1-1) – See H2H details
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (2-1) – See H2H details
- Polona HercogHercog – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (1-0) – See H2H details
- Arantxa RusRus – Donna VekicVekic (0-1) – See H2H details
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (1-0) – See H2H details
- Sara ErraniErrani – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (5-2) – See H2H details
- Kristyna PliskovaPliskova – Maria SakkariSakkari (0-1) – See H2H details
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-0) – See H2H details
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (1-1) – See H2H details