Mohamed Safwat and Tallon Griekspoor will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Nur-Sultan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.83
Mohamed Safwat -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mohamed Safwat vs. Tallon Griekspoor
There is no head to head record between Mohamed Safwat and Tallon Griekspoor since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Mohamed Safwat
Ranked no. 131, the Egyptian reached the 3rd round after beating Grigoriy Lomakin 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Egyptian had a good straight sets win against Lomakin (6-2 6-4). During the match Safwat scored 60 points vs Lomakin’s 47. The Egyptian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Safwat couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mohamed Safwat was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (22/28) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Safwat broke Lomakin 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Safwat has a losing record in the last 9 years having won 47% of his matches (119-105). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Safwat has a 402-243 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Safwat’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Launceston Challenger.
Safwat has a 13-6 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger
The Egyptian didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.
Tallon Griekspoor
Ranked no. 199, the Dutch got to the 3rd round after beating Nino Serdarusic 6-3 7-65.
In the 2nd round, Griekspoor had a good straight sets win against Serdarusic (6-3 7-65). During the match Griekspoor scored 79 points vs Serdarusic’s 65. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Griekspoor blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (35/41) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tallon broke Serdarusic once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Griekspoor has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 51% of his matches (95-90). 2-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Griekspoor has a 203-120 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch has a 5-4 win-loss record in 2020, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger
The Dutch didn’t play in the The Nur-Sultan Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Safwat | Griekspoor |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 22 |
Pts | 60-47 | 79-65 |
Total Points | 107 | 144 |
Winners | 22 | 35 |
%Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Safwat and Griekspoor played 1 matche. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Safwat and Griekspoor have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Safwat played 4 games less than Griekspoor. The Egyptian scored 22 winners (37% on total points). On the other side, Griekspoor blasted 35 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Safwat | Griekspoor |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 7 |
Avg per match | 0 | 7 |
1st in | 28/54 | 41/65 |
%1st in | 52% | 63% |
1st pts | 22/28 | 35/41 |
%1st pts | 79% | 85% |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 15/24 |
%2nd pts | 65% | 63% |
Safwat didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Griekspoor blasted 7 aces . Safwat won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Griekspoor won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Safwat | Griekspoor |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 1 |
Converted | 3/4 | 1/6 |
% Converted | 75% | 17% |
Conceded | 0 | 0 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | NAN% | NAN% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Safwat broke his opponent 3 times with 75% conversion rate. Mohamed was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Griekspoor broke his opponent once with 17% conversion rate. Griekspoor was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Safwat | |||
R2 Lomakin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 60-47 | 60-47 | |
Total points | 107 | 107 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 28/54 | 28/54 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | -100 |
Griekspoor | |||
R2 Serdarusic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 79-65 | 79-65 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 41/65 | 41/65 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 35/41 | 35/41 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | -100 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Sultan Challenger
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Robin HaaseHaase (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (w/o) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Lukas KleinKlein (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Sanjar FayzievFayziev (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Szymon WalkowWalkow (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Simon FreundFreund (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Yannick MadenMaden (w/o) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Aleksandr NedovesovNedovesov (w/o) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Nenad ZimonjicZimonjic – (0-0) – See H2H details
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Alexey ZakharovZakharov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – See H2H details
- Arthur De GreefDe Greef – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Pavel KotovKotov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – See H2H details
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Elias YmerYmer – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-1) – See H2H details
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – See H2H details