Quentin Halys and Ernests Gulbis will clash against each other in the quarter of the Pau Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:00 pm on CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ernests Gulbis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ernests Gulbis is the pick to win this match.
Ernests Gulbis -> 1.72
Quentin Halys -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Ernests Gulbis
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Ernests Gulbis since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gulbis won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in Montpellier back in 2016.
Quentin Halys
Ranked no. 193, Halys got to the 1st round after beating Matteo Viola 6-1 6-2 and Lukas Lacko 7-62 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Halys had a good straight sets win against Lacko (7-62 6-2). During the match Halys scored 78 points vs Lacko’s 59. Halys was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Halys blasted 18 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Quentin Halys lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Halys put 70% of his first serves in, winning 88% (38/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. Halys broke Lacko 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French Player hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Halys has won exactly 50% of his matches (249-247) in the last 9 years. 5-4 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Halys has a 158-142 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Halys has a 8-6 win-loss record in 2020, 5-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Pau Challenger
Halys lost in the quarter 6-4 6-4 to Steve Darcis.
Ernests Gulbis
Ranked no. 220, the Latvian got to the 1st round after beating Leo Borg 6-2 6-3, Norbert Gombos 7-67 7-61 and Alex Molcan 6-1 6-73 6-4.
In the 3rd round, Ernests defeated Molcan (6-1 6-73 6-4). During the match Gulbis scored 103 points vs Molcan’s 90. The Latvian was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Gulbis blasted 12 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Ernests Gulbis was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (45/60) of his 1st serve and 56% (24/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Latvian broke Molcan 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Latvian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Gulbis has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (319-230). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gulbis has a 218-197 win-loss record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
The Latvian has a 12-4 win-loss record in 2020, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Pau Challenger
Ernests didn’t compete in the Pau Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Halys | Gulbis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 73 |
| Pts | 132-87 | 237-199 |
| Total Points | 219 | 436 |
| Winners | 63 | 111 |
| %Winners | 48% | 47% |
Halys played 2 matches while Gulbis competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Ernests Gulbis conceded 1 set while Quentin Halys hasn’t lost a set so far. Halys has played 3 sets less than Gulbis (4 vs 7). Therefore, Halys played 37 games less than Gulbis. The French Player scored 63 winners (48% on total points). On the other side, Gulbis blasted 111 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Halys | Gulbis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 25 | 35 |
| Avg per match | 12.5 | 11.7 |
| 1st in | 73/105 | 135/222 |
| %1st in | 70% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 63/73 | 111/135 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 54/87 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 62% |
Halys blasted 25 aces (12.5 per match). Gulbis blasted 35 aces (11.7 per match). Halys won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Gulbis won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Halys | Gulbis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 7 |
| Converted | 8/12 | 7/21 |
| % Converted | 67% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Quentin broke his opponents 8 times with 67% conversion rate. Halys conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Ernests broke his opponents 7 times with 33% conversion rate. The Latvian conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Halys | ||||
| R2 Viola |
R3 Lacko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 21 | 36 | |
| pts | 54-28 | 78-59 | 132-87 | |
| Total points | 82 | 137 | 219 | |
| Winners | 25 | 38 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 49% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 18 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 43/61 | 73/105 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 38/43 | 63/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 88% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 8/18 | 14/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/6 | 8/12 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 50% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Gulbis | |||||
| R1 Borg |
R2 Gombos |
R3 Molcan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 7-67 7-61 | 6-1 6-73 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 30 | 73 | |
| pts | 62-37 | 72-72 | 103-90 | 237-199 | |
| Total points | 99 | 144 | 193 | 436 | |
| Winners | 26 | 40 | 45 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 56% | 44% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 14 | 12 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 29/40 | 46/79 | 60/103 | 135/222 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 58% | 58% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 40/46 | 45/60 | 111/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 87% | 75% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/11 | 20/33 | 24/43 | 54/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 91% | 61% | 56% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 0/0 | 4/13 | 7/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | NAN% | 31% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 3/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 75% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | -67 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW
Tennis Scores in Pau Challenger
- Harold MayotMayot – Hugo GastonGaston (6-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Lukas LackoLacko (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-64 7-64) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-4 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-1 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – See H2H details
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-1) – See H2H details
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz (0-0) – See H2H details
