Jeff Wolf and Roberto Quiroz will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.25
Roberto Quiroz -> 3.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Roberto Quiroz
There is no head to head record between Jeff Wolf and Roberto Quiroz since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jeff Wolf
Ranked no. 163 (career high), the American reached the 3rd round after beating James Ward 6-75 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Ward, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 6-4). During the match Wolf scored 102 points vs Ward’s 82. Jeff was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf overpowered his opponent with 26 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Jeff Wolf was extremely effective on serve to win 91% (42/46) of his 1st serve and 60% (25/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Wolf broke Ward 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Wolf has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 48% of his matches (31-29). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wolf has a 31-24 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Wolf’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Noumea Challenger.
The American has a 11-3 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
The American capitulated in the final 6-3 7-64 to Peter Polansky.
Roberto Quiroz
Ranked no. 275, Quiroz reached the 3rd round after defeating John Mcnally 7-63 7-65 and Andrew Harris 7-65 4-6 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Ecuadorian defeated Harris (7-65 4-6 6-1). During the match Quiroz scored 97 points vs Harris’s 93. Roberto was extremely aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about serving, Quiroz blasted 11 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Roberto Quiroz lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Quiroz put 68% of his first serves in, winning 83% (53/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Harris twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ecuadorian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Quiroz has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (115-67). 6-3 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quiroz has a 105-86 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Quiroz has a 8-5 win-loss record in 2020, 6-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Columbus Challenger
Roberto lost in the semifinal 7-67 7-64 to Peter Polansky.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 56 |
| Pts | 102-82 | 97-93 |
| Total Points | 184 | 190 |
| Winners | 42 | 53 |
| %Winners | 41% | 55% |
Wolf played 1 match while Quiroz competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jeff Wolf conceded 1 set, while Roberto Quiroz dropper 1 set. Wolf has played 2 sets less than Quiroz (3 vs 5). Therefore, Wolf played 24 games less than Quiroz. The American scored 42 winners (41% on total points). On the other side, Quiroz blasted 53 winners (55%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 26 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 64/94 |
| %1st in | 52% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 42/46 | 53/64 |
| %1st pts | 91% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 12/30 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 40% |
Wolf blasted 26 aces . Quiroz blasted 11 aces (5.5 per match). Wolf won 91% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Quiroz won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 2/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 22% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Wolf broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. Jeff conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Quiroz broke his opponents twice with 22% conversion rate. Roberto conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | |||
| R2 Ward |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 102-82 | 102-82 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 26 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 46/88 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 42/46 | 42/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
| Quiroz | ||||
| R1 Mcnally |
R2 Harris |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 7-65 | 7-65 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 30 | 56 | |
| pts | – | 97-93 | 97-93 | |
| Total points | 0 | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 53 | 53 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 64/94 | 64/94 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | / | 53/64 | 53/64 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 12/30 | 12/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | ||
| Converted | / | 2/9 | 2/9 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 22% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | -50 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWLLL
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Denis IstominIstomin – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Kevin KingKing (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Guilherme ClezarClezar – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-6 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Lloyd GlasspoolGlasspool (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Diego HidalgoHidalgo (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zhe LiLi – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Dudi SelaSela (7-5 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – James WardWard (6-75 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ricardo Rodriguez-PaceRodriguez-Pace (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Peter PolanskyPolansky (4-6 6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Andrew HarrisHarris (7-65 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Diego HidalgoHidalgo (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Emilio GomezGomez – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-2) – See H2H details
- Guilherme ClezarClezar – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-1) – See H2H details
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Zhe LiLi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (1-0) – See H2H details
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – See H2H details
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-3) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – See H2H details
