Botic Van De Zandschulp and Tomas Machac will face off in the final of the Koblenz Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.80
Tomas Machac -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Tomas Machac
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Tomas Machac clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 204, Botic got to the final after beating Igor Sijsling w/o, Maximilian Marterer 6-4 6-2, Yannick Maden 4-6 6-4 6-4 and Nicola Kuhn 6-4 3-6 6-2.
In the semifinal, Botic defeated Kuhn (6-4 3-6 6-2). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 87 points vs Kuhn’s 76. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp blasted 16 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 70% of his first serves in, winning 77% (46/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Kuhn 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Botic has conceded 2 set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 30% of his matches (168-71). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a 120-65 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was getting to the semi-finals in the Koblenz Challenger.
Van De Zandschulp has a 4-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Botic didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Tomas Machac
Ranked no. 347, the Czech got to the final after beating Leopold Zima 6-2 6-2, Teimuraz Gabashvili 6-0 6-3, Vit Kopriva 6-3 6-3, Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 6-4 and Ruben Bemelmans 6-2 6-4.
In the semifinal, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Bemelmans (6-2 6-4). During the match Machac scored 69 points vs Bemelmans’s 46. Machac was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Machac blasted 6 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Tomas Machac was extremely effective on serve to win 93% (27/29) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tomas broke Bemelmans 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Machac hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
Machac has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 75% of his matches (24-8). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Machac has a 7-6 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Machac’s best result of the current year was reaching the semi-finals in the Koblenz Challenger.
Tomas has a 6-2 win-loss record in 2020, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Tomas didn’t compete in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Machac |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 75 | 87 |
| Pts | 242-201 | 323-220 |
| Total Points | 443 | 543 |
| Winners | 117 | 130 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Van De Zandschulp played 3 matches while Machac competed in 5 matches. At the moment, Botic Van De Zandschulp lost 2 sets while Tomas Machac hasn’t lost a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 2 sets less than Machac (8 vs 10). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 12 games less than Machac. The Dutch scored 117 winners (48% on total points). On the other side, The Czech blasted 130 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Machac |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 32 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 10.7 | 4 |
| 1st in | 148/219 | 155/236 |
| %1st in | 68% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 117/148 | 130/155 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 38/71 | 45/81 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 56% |
Van De Zandschulp blasted 32 aces (10.7 per match). Machac blasted 20 aces (4 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 79% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Machac won 84% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Machac |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 19 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 19/44 |
| % Converted | 59% | 43% |
| Conceded | 15 | 10 |
| Saved | 11 | 8 |
| % Saved | 73% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 10 times with 59% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Machac broke his opponents 19 times with 43% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||||
| R2 Sijsling |
R3 Marterer |
1/4 Maden |
1/2 Kuhn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | w/o | 6-4 6-2 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | 18 | 30 | 27 | 75 | |
| pts | – | 59-40 | 96-85 | 87-76 | 242-201 | |
| Total points | 0 | 99 | 181 | 163 | 443 | |
| Winners | 24 | 47 | 46 | 117 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | 41% | 49% | 53% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 0 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 | ||
| 1st in | / | 27/43 | 61/90 | 60/86 | 148/219 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | 63% | 68% | 70% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | / | 24/27 | 47/61 | 46/60 | 117/148 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | 89% | 77% | 77% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 12/16 | 15/29 | 11/26 | 38/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | 75% | 52% | 42% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | ||
| Converted | / | 3/4 | 3/7 | 4/6 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | 75% | 43% | 67% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 | 7 | 15 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0/0 | 6/8 | 5/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 75% | 71% | 37% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Machac | |||||||
| R1 Zima |
R2 Gabashvili |
R3 Kopriva |
1/4 Kuzmanov |
1/2 Bemelmans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-0 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 87 | |
| pts | 65-38 | 63-38 | 62-50 | 64-48 | 69-46 | 323-220 | |
| Total points | 103 | 101 | 112 | 112 | 115 | 543 | |
| Winners | 21 | 26 | 27 | 29 | 27 | 130 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 41% | 44% | 45% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 31/42 | 35/56 | 36/49 | 29/50 | 155/236 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 74% | 63% | 73% | 58% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 26/31 | 27/35 | 29/36 | 27/29 | 130/155 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 84% | 77% | 81% | 93% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 4/11 | 12/21 | 6/13 | 12/21 | 45/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 36% | 57% | 46% | 57% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 19 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/10 | 3/7 | 4/6 | 3/10 | 19/44 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 50% | 43% | 67% | 30% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 3/3 | 1/3 | 2/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 100% | 33% | 100% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -60 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLWL
LWWLWWWWLW Upcoming matches
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Tomas MachacMachac (2-0) – See H2H details
