Tallon Griekspoor and Daniel Masur will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the Koblenz Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.66
Daniel Masur -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Tallon Griekspoor and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tallon Griekspoor
Ranked no. 198, Griekspoor got to the 3rd round after beating Lucas Gerch 6-4 2-6 7-63.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch defeated Gerch (6-4 2-6 7-63).-119) than Gerch. In fact, the world no. 198 won 119 points vs Gerch’s. That means that Griekspoor was more focused during the important points. Tallon was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Griekspoor blasted 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Griekspoor put 65% of his first serves in, winning 59% (51/86) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (22/46) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Gerch 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Griekspoor has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 53% of his matches (34-38). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Griekspoor has a 44-41 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
The Dutch didn’t play in the Koblenz Challenger in 2019.
Daniel Masur
Ranked no. 256, Masur reached the 3rd round after defeating Vaclav Safranek 5-7 7-62 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Safranek, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-62 6-2). During the match Masur scored 117 points vs Safranek’s 111. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 60 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur blasted 17 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve 4 times and he saved 16 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 65% of his first serves in, winning 71% (60/84) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (16/46) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Safranek 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Masur has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (120-88). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Masur has a 89-88 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Daniel has a 3-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Koblenz Challenger
Masur capitulated in the 1st round 6-4 6-2 to Tak Khunn Wang.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 33 |
| Pts | 119-123 | 117-111 |
| Total Points | 242 | 228 |
| Winners | 51 | 60 |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% |
Both Griekspoor and Masur played 1 matche. Both players lost a set in the event. Tallon Griekspoor conceded 1 set, while Daniel Masur dropper 1 set. Talking about their workload, Griekspoor and Masur have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Griekspoor played 2 games less than Masur. Griekspoor scored 51 winners (43% on total points). On the other side, Masur blasted 60 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 17 |
| 1st in | 86/132 | 84/130 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 51/86 | 60/84 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 22/46 | 16/46 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 35% |
Griekspoor blasted 5 aces . Masur blasted 17 aces . Griekspoor won 59% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 35% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 27% | 63% |
| Conceded | 15 | 20 |
| Saved | 11 | 16 |
| % Saved | 73% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Tallon broke his opponent 3 times with 27% conversion rate. Tallon conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Masur broke his opponent 5 times with 63% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | |||
| R2 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 119-123 | 119-123 | |
| Total points | 242 | 242 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 86/132 | 86/132 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 51/86 | 51/86 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/46 | 22/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
| Masur | |||
| R2 Safranek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 117-111 | 117-111 | |
| Total points | 228 | 228 | |
| Winners | 60 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 84/130 | 84/130 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 60/84 | 60/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/46 | 16/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 35% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 20 | 20 | |
| Saved | 16/20 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWLWW
WWLWLWWLLL Tennis Scores in Koblenz Challenger
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Lucas GerchGerch (6-4 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Oscar OtteOtte (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alessandro BegaBega (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Dustin BrownBrown – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (5-7 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-77 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Milan WelteWelte (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Louis WesselsWessels (3-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Julian LenzLenz (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Igor SijslingSijsling – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-2) – See H2H details
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – See H2H details
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – See H2H details
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – See H2H details
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mirza BasicBasic (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tomas MachacMachac – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-2) – See H2H details
