Jc Aragone and Raymond Sarmiento will play each other in the 3rd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raymond Sarmiento who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raymond Sarmiento is the pick to win this match.
Raymond Sarmiento -> 1.83
Jc Aragone -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jc Aragone vs. Raymond Sarmiento
This will be the 2nd time that Jc Aragone and Raymond Sarmiento face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sarmiento (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Sarmiento won 7-5 7-63 in the 3rd round in Newport Beach Challenger back in January 2020.
Jc Aragone
Ranked no. 261, the American reached the 3rd round after defeating Diego Hidalgo 6-4 6-3 and Christopher O Connell 7-65 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Aragone had a good straight sets win against O Connell (7-65 6-2). During the match Aragone scored 72 points vs O Connell’s 58. Aragone was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Aragone blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jc Aragone was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (33/45) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jc broke O Connell 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Aragone has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 44% of his matches (140-112). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Aragone has a 57-55 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Jc has a 8-4 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Cleveland Challenger
The American didn’t play in the Cleveland Challenger in 2019.
Raymond Sarmiento
Ranked no. 431, the American got to the 3rd round after beating Alexander Brown 6-4 6-2 and Ji Sung Nam 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Sung Nam (6-3 6-2). During the match Sarmiento scored 58 points vs Sung Nam’s 36. Raymond was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Sarmiento blasted 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Raymond Sarmiento was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Raymond broke Sung Nam 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Raymond hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 60% of the points he played.
Sarmiento has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (89-54). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Sarmiento has a 52-37 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Raymond has a 7-2 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Cleveland Challenger
Raymond didn’t play in the Cleveland Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Aragone | Sarmiento |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 35 |
| Pts | 140-113 | 113-75 |
| Total Points | 253 | 188 |
| Winners | 72 | 45 |
| %Winners | 51% | 40% |
Both Aragone and Sarmiento played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Aragone and Sarmiento have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Aragone played 5 games more than Sarmiento. Jc scored 72 winners (51% on total points). On the other side, Sarmiento blasted 45 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Aragone | Sarmiento |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 92/131 | 55/91 |
| %1st in | 70% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 72/92 | 45/55 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 21/39 | 25/36 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 69% |
Aragone blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Sarmiento blasted 9 aces (4.5 per match). Aragone won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Sarmiento won 82% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Aragone | Sarmiento |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 63% | 54% |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 |
| Saved | 9 | 1 |
| % Saved | 90% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The American broke his opponents 5 times with 63% conversion rate. Jc conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. Raymond broke his opponents 7 times with 54% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Aragone | ||||
| R1 Hidalgo |
R2 O |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 | 40 | |
| pts | 68-55 | 72-58 | 140-113 | |
| Total points | 123 | 130 | 253 | |
| Winners | 39 | 33 | 72 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 46% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 45/63 | 92/131 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 71% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 39/47 | 33/45 | 72/92 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 12/18 | 21/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 67% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/4 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 2/3 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | -50 | |
| Sarmiento | ||||
| R1 Brown |
R2 Sung Nam |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 55-39 | 58-36 | 113-75 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | 188 | |
| Winners | 21 | 24 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 31/47 | 55/91 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 66% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 24/31 | 45/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 77% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 10/16 | 25/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 63% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/8 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | -50 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Roberto CidCid (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-72 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Guilherme ClezarClezar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Raymond SarmientoSarmiento – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian KordaKorda – Donald YoungYoung (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jc AragoneAragone – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sekou BangouraBangoura (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Roberto CidCid (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-1 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-7(2) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Denis KudlaKudla – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – See H2H details
- Raymond SarmientoSarmiento – Jc AragoneAragone (1-1) – See H2H details
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-1) – See H2H details
- Michael MmohMmoh – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (2-0) – See H2H details
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – See H2H details
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Thomaz BellucciBellucci (0-0) – See H2H details
