Egor Gerasimov and James Duckworth will square off in the semifinal of the Tata Open Maharashtra for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 7:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Egor Gerasimov who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Egor Gerasimov is the pick to win this match.
Egor Gerasimov -> 1.80
James Duckworth -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Egor Gerasimov vs. James Duckworth
This will be the 2nd time that Egor Gerasimov and James Duckworth square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Duckworth won 6-4 6-2 in the quarter in Kolkata Challenger back in 2015.
Egor Gerasimov
Ranked no. 90 (career high), Egor reached the quarter after defeating Paolo Lorenzi 6-2 6-3, Nikola Milojevic 2-6 6-3 6-2 and Soon-Woo Kwon 4-6 7-61 6-4.
In the quarter against Kwon, The Belarussian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-61 6-4). During the match Gerasimov scored 107 points vs Kwon’s 98. Egor was extremely aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Gerasimov blasted 18 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Egor Gerasimov was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (49/64) of his 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Egor broke Kwon twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gerasimov has lost 2 set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
Gerasimov has a weak win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 40% of his matches (441-288). 4-3 on hard in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gerasimov has a 179-129 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Egor has a 4-3 win-loss record in 2020, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Pune
Egor didn’t compete in Pune in 2019.
James Duckworth
Ranked no. 96, James reached the quarter after beating Peter Gojowczyk 7-65 6-4, Taro Daniel 6-74 7-66 6-3 and Roberto Marcora 6-3 7-64.
In the quarter, Duckworth had a good straight sets win against Marcora (6-3 7-64). During the match Duckworth scored 72 points vs Marcora’s 69. Duckworth was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Duckworth blasted 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. James Duckworth lost the serve once. Furthermore, Duckworth put 55% of his first serves in, winning 85% (35/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. James broke Marcora twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Duckworth has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (628-444). 4-2 on hard in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Duckworth has a 188-151 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Duckworth has a 4-2 win-loss record in 2020, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Pune
The Australian conquered the title last year in Pune Challenger after beating Jay Clarke 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gerasimov | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 75 | 80 |
| Pts | 249-215 | 270-260 |
| Total Points | 464 | 530 |
| Winners | 122 | 121 |
| %Winners | 49% | 45% |
Both Gerasimov and Duckworth played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Egor Gerasimov conceded 2 sets, while James Duckworth dropper 1 set. Gerasimov has played 1 sets more than Duckworth (8 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Gerasimov played 5 games less than Duckworth. Egor scored 122 winners (49% on total points). On the other side, The Australian blasted 121 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gerasimov | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 35 | 34 |
| Avg per match | 11.7 | 11.3 |
| 1st in | 160/235 | 156/273 |
| %1st in | 68% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 122/160 | 121/156 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 39/75 | 65/117 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Gerasimov blasted 35 aces (11.7 per match). Duckworth blasted 34 aces (11.3 per match). Gerasimov won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Duckworth won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gerasimov | Duckworth |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 5 |
| Converted | 9/21 | 5/16 |
| % Converted | 43% | 31% |
| Conceded | 15 | 12 |
| Saved | 10 | 10 |
| % Saved | 67% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Egor broke his opponents 9 times with 43% conversion rate. The Belarussian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. James broke his opponents 5 times with 31% conversion rate. Duckworth conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gerasimov | |||||
| R1 Lorenzi |
R2 Milojevic |
1/4 Kwon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 7-61 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 25 | 33 | 75 | |
| pts | 61-42 | 81-75 | 107-98 | 249-215 | |
| Total points | 103 | 156 | 205 | 464 | |
| Winners | 26 | 47 | 49 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 58% | 46% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 8 | 18 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 61/89 | 64/97 | 160/235 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 69% | 66% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 47/61 | 49/64 | 122/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 77% | 77% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 10/28 | 20/33 | 39/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 36% | 61% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/7 | 2/7 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 43% | 29% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 4/6 | 3/5 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 60% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 2 | 67 | |
| Duckworth | |||||
| R1 Gojowczyk |
R2 Daniel |
1/4 Marcora |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | 6-74 7-66 6-3 | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 35 | 22 | 80 | |
| pts | 74-70 | 124-121 | 72-69 | 270-260 | |
| Total points | 144 | 245 | 141 | 530 | |
| Winners | 30 | 56 | 35 | 121 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 45% | 49% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 16 | 9 | 34 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 43/75 | 72/123 | 41/75 | 156/273 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 59% | 55% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 30/43 | 56/72 | 35/41 | 121/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 78% | 85% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/32 | 28/51 | 16/34 | 65/117 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 55% | 47% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 2/11 | 2/4 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 18% | 50% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 1 | 12 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 8/9 | 0/1 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 89% | 0% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | -33 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWWL
LLLLWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Pune
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Yuichi SugitaSugita (4-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (4-6 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (2-6 6-1 7-611) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (4-6 7-6(1) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (1-0) – See H2H details
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-1) – See H2H details
