Emilio Gomez and Jeff Wolf will square off in the quarter of the Dallas Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on HAMILTON FAMILY STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 2 sets.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.16
Emilio Gomez -> 5.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Jeff Wolf
This will be the 2nd time that Emilio Gomez and Jeff Wolf play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Wolf (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Wolf won 6-2 7-65 in the semifinal in Columbus Challenger back in 2019.
Emilio Gomez
Ranked no. 156, the Ecuadorian got to the semifinal after beating Maxime Cressy 6-3 4-6 6-3
and Jason Jung 4-6 6-4 7-66.In the 2nd round, The Ecuadorian defeated Cressy (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match Gomez scored 85 points vs Cressy’s 79. Emilio was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Gomez blasted 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Emilio Gomez was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (42/55) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gomez broke Cressy 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Gomez has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (42-22). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Gomez has a 114-117 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
Gomez has a 1-3 win-loss record in 2020, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
Emilio didn’t compete in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Jeff Wolf
Ranked no. 183, Jeff reached the semifinal after defeating Ernesto Escobedo 7-67 6-3 and Yosuke Watanuki 6-4 7-5.
In the 3rd round, Jeff had a good straight sets win against Watanuki (6-4 7-5). During the match Wolf scored 72 points vs Watanuki’s 58. Jeff was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Wolf blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jeff Wolf was extremely effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 80% (20/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jeff broke Watanuki twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wolf hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Wolf has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 53% of his matches (19-17). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wolf has a 29-22 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Noumea Challenger.
The American has a 9-1 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Dallas Challenger
Wolf didn’t compete in the Dallas Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 44 |
| Pts | 85-79 | 158-133 |
| Total Points | 164 | 291 |
| Winners | 42 | 56 |
| %Winners | 49% | 35% |
Gomez played 1 match while Wolf competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Emilio Gomez conceded 1 set while Jeff Wolf hasn’t lost a set so far. Gomez has played 1 sets less than Wolf (3 vs 4). Therefore, Gomez played 16 games less than Wolf. Emilio scored 42 winners (49% on total points). On the other side, The American blasted 56 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 10 |
| 1st in | 55/82 | 73/136 |
| %1st in | 67% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 56/73 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 42/63 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 67% |
Gomez blasted 4 aces . Wolf blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Gomez won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Wolf won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 43% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Emilio broke his opponent 3 times with 43% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Wolf broke his opponents 5 times with 38% conversion rate. Wolf conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | |||
| R2 Cressy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 85-79 | 85-79 | |
| Total points | 164 | 164 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 55/82 | 55/82 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 42/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | |
| Wolf | ||||
| R2 Escobedo | R3 Watanuki | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | 44 | |
| pts | 86-75 | 72-58 | 158-133 | |
| Total points | 161 | 130 | 291 | |
| Winners | 29 | 27 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 15 | 5 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/79 | 32/57 | 73/136 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 56% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 27/32 | 56/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 84% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/38 | 20/25 | 42/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 80% | 67% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 2/5 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 40% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 100% | 160% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Dallas Challenger
- Emilio GomezGomez – Jason JungJung (4-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Michael MmohMmoh (6-74 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Denis IstominIstomin (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (3-6 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Bradley KlahnKlahn (3-6 7-66 7-65) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (3-6 7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – See H2H details
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-1) – See H2H details
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – See H2H details
- Jeff WolfWolf – Emilio GomezGomez (1-0) – See H2H details