Cem Ilkel and Vit Kopriva will clash against each other in the quarter of the the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.53
Vit Kopriva -> 2.37
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Vit Kopriva
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Vit Kopriva since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 266, the Turk got to the quarter after beating Viktor Durasovic 4-6 6-4 6-4, Danilo Petrovic 7-66 3-1 ret. and Constant Lestienne 4-6 7-5 6-3.
In the 3rd round against Lestienne, Cem recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-3).-97) than Lestienne. In fact, the world no. 266 won 97 points vs Lestienne’s. That means that Ilkel was more focused during the important points. The Turk was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Cem Ilkel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 61% of his first serves in, winning 69% (46/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (18/43) on the 2nd serve. Ilkel broke Lestienne 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cem has conceded 2 set in this tournament to conquer 50% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a losing record in the last 7 years having won 45% of his matches (60-50). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ilkel has a 62-78 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Cem has a 6-3 win-loss record in 2020, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Ilkel didn’t compete in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Vit Kopriva
Ranked no. 354, Kopriva reached the quarter after beating Pedja Krstin 6-3 6-3, Tristan Lamasine 6-4 7-66 and Alexey Vatutin 7-62 7-64.
In the 3rd round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (7-62 7-64). During the match Kopriva scored 85 points vs Vatutin’s 84. The Czech was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Kopriva blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Vit Kopriva was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (38/50) of his 1st serve and 57% (25/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Vit broke Vatutin once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kopriva hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Kopriva has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 77% of his matches (20-6). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kopriva has a 7-16 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Kopriva has a 4-1 win-loss record in 2020, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper Challenger
Kopriva didn’t compete in the Quimper Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ilkel | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
Tot Games | 61 | 67 |
Pts | 198-197 | 234-210 |
Total Points | 395 | 444 |
Winners | 101 | 106 |
%Winners | 51% | 45% |
Ilkel played 2 matches while Kopriva competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Cem Ilkel lost 2 sets while Vit Kopriva hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, Ilkel and Kopriva have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Ilkel played 6 games less than Kopriva. Cem scored 101 winners (51% on total points). On the other side, Vit blasted 106 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ilkel | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Aces | 21 | 21 |
Avg per match | 10.5 | 7 |
1st in | 139/210 | 142/247 |
%1st in | 66% | 57% |
1st pts | 101/139 | 106/142 |
%1st pts | 73% | 75% |
2nd pts | 31/71 | 54/105 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 51% |
Ilkel blasted 21 aces (10.5 per match). Kopriva blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Ilkel won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Kopriva won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ilkel | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 8 |
Converted | 7/20 | 8/12 |
% Converted | 35% | 67% |
Conceded | 15 | 19 |
Saved | 10 | 15 |
% Saved | 67% | 79% |
Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Ilkel broke his opponents 7 times with 35% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 8 times with 67% conversion rate. Kopriva conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Ilkel | |||||
R1 Durasovic |
R2 Petrovic |
R3 Lestienne |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 7-66 3-1 ret. | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 17 | 31 | 78 | |
pts | 101-96 | 59-52 | 97-101 | 257-249 | |
Total points | 197 | 111 | 198 | 506 | |
Winners | 55 | 21 | 46 | 122 | |
%Winners | 54% | 36% | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 13 | 7 | 8 | 28 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 6 | 8 | |
1st in | 72/100 | 36/55 | 67/110 | 175/265 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 65% | 61% | 66% | |
1st pts | 55/72 | 21/36 | 46/67 | 122/175 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 58% | 69% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 13/28 | 15/19 | 18/43 | 46/90 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 79% | 42% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | |
Converted | 2/8 | 2/4 | 5/12 | 9/24 | |
Converted % | 25% | 50% | 42% | 38% | |
Conceded | 7 | 3 | 8 | 18 | |
Saved | 6/7 | 2/3 | 4/8 | 12 | |
Saved % | 86% | 67% | 50% | 68% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 4 | 100 |
Kopriva | |||||
R1 Krstin |
R2 Lamasine |
R3 Vatutin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 7-66 | 7-62 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 26 | 67 | |
pts | 66-46 | 83-80 | 85-84 | 234-210 | |
Total points | 112 | 163 | 169 | 444 | |
Winners | 25 | 43 | 38 | 106 | |
%Winners | 38% | 52% | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 5 | 10 | 21 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
1st in | 32/56 | 60/97 | 50/94 | 142/247 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 62% | 53% | 57% | |
1st pts | 25/32 | 43/60 | 38/50 | 106/142 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 72% | 76% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 16/24 | 13/37 | 25/44 | 54/105 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 35% | 57% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/6 | 1/3 | 8/12 | |
Converted % | 100% | 67% | 33% | 67% | |
Conceded | 3 | 9 | 7 | 19 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 6/9 | 6/7 | 15 | |
Saved % | 100% | 67% | 86% | 84% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 1 | 33 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Guillermo Garcia-LopezGarcia-Lopez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-1 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Daniel MasurMasur (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Alexey VatutinVatutin (7-62 7-64) – See score progression
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Constant LestienneLestienne (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Lukas LackoLacko (5-2) – See H2H details
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Matthias BachingerBachinger (1-0) – See H2H details
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Maxime JanvierJanvier (1-0) – See H2H details
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details