Madison Brengle and Yanina Wickmayer will play each other in the 3rd round of the the Oracle Challenger Series for the 3rd time of their career. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Madison Brengle who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Madison Brengle is the pick to win this match.
Madison Brengle -> 1.61
Yanina Wickmayer -> 2.30
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Madison Brengle vs. Yanina Wickmayer
This will be the 3rd time that Madison Brengle and Yanina Wickmayer play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Brengle and Wickmayer (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Wickmayer won 7-5 6-4 in the 1st round in the Washington back in 2016.
Madison Brengle
Ranked no. 95, Madison got to the 1st round after defeating Mayo Hibi 6-1 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Hibi (6-1 7-5). During the match Brengle scored 69 points vs Hibi’s 50. Brengle was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Brengle wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Madison Brengle lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Brengle put 78% of her first serves in, winning 60% (26/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (4/12) on the 2nd serve. Brengle broke Hibi 8 times after converting 62% of her break points (8/13).
Brengle has a losing record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of her matches (464-478). 3-3 on hard in 2020. . Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Brengle has a 125-143 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Madison has a 3-3 win-loss record in 2020, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Newport Beach
Madison lost in the 2nd round 2-6 6-4 6-2 to Renata Zarazua.
Yanina Wickmayer
Ranked no. 147, the Belgian got to the 1st round after beating Claire Liu 6-1 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Wickmayer had a good straight sets win against Liu (6-1 6-3). During the match Wickmayer scored 58 points vs Liu’s 32. Wickmayer was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Wickmayer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Yanina Wickmayer lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Wickmayer put 65% of her first serves in, winning 82% (23/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (5/15) on the 2nd serve. Wickmayer broke Liu 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Wickmayer has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 52% of her matches (539-492). 2-2 on hard in 2020. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wickmayer has a 185-180 win-loss record in the last 10 years on hard.
The Belgian has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2020, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Newport Beach
Yanina lost in the 2nd round 6-2 6-2 to Allie Kiick.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brengle | Wickmayer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 |
| Pts | 69-50 | 58-32 |
| Total Points | 119 | 90 |
| Winners | 26 | 23 |
| %Winners | 38% | 40% |
Both Brengle and Wickmayer played 1 matche. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Brengle and Wickmayer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Brengle played 3 games more than Wickmayer. Madison scored 26 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, Yanina blasted 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brengle | Wickmayer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 43/55 | 28/43 |
| %1st in | 78% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 26/43 | 23/28 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 4/12 | 5/15 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 33% |
Brengle didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wickmayer blasted 1 ace . Brengle won 60% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Wickmayer won 82% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brengle | Wickmayer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 6 |
| Converted | 8/13 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 62% | 75% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 56% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The American broke her opponent 8 times with 62% conversion rate. Brengle conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded. Yanina broke her opponent 6 times with 75% conversion rate. Yanina conceded her serve twice and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Brengle | |||
| R2 Hibi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-50 | 69-50 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/55 | 43/55 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| Converted % | 62% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 300 | |
| Wickmayer | |||
| R2 Liu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-32 | 58-32 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 23/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 100 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLLLL Tennis Scores in Newport Beach
- Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg – Quinn GleasonGleason (7-5 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefanie VoegeleVoegele – Hanna ChangChang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Mayo HibiHibi (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Claire LiuLiu (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Irina FalconiFalconi – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Sara ErraniErrani (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Jessika PonchetPonchet (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicole GibbsGibbs – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shelby RogersRogers – Alexa GlatchGlatch (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Grace MinMin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Amandine HesseHesse (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sophia WhittleWhittle – Robin AndersonAnderson (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Allie KiickKiick (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Madison BrengleBrengle (2-1) – See H2H details
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Shelby RogersRogers (2-1) – See H2H details
- Veronica Cepede RoygCepede Royg – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (2-0) – See H2H details
- Stefanie VoegeleVoegele – Irina FalconiFalconi (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sophia WhittleWhittle – Christina MchaleMchale (0-0) – See H2H details
- Nicole GibbsGibbs – Coco VandewegheVandeweghe (0-2) – See H2H details
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Taylor TownsendTownsend (1-0) – See H2H details
