Cem Ilkel and Arthur Rinderknech will clash against each other in the quarter of the the Rennes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:30 pm on LE LIBERTE. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Rinderknech who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Rinderknech is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Rinderknech -> 1.57
Cem Ilkel -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Arthur Rinderknech
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Arthur Rinderknech since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 266, Ilkel got to the quarter after defeating Alessandro Bega 6-4 6-2 and Antoine Escoffier 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Ilkel defeated Escoffier (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match Ilkel scored 80 points vs Escoffier’s 78. The Turk was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel blasted 8 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Cem Ilkel lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 68% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Ilkel broke Escoffier 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Turk has lost 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (39-43). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a 59-77 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Cem has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
Ilkel didn’t play in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Arthur Rinderknech
Ranked no. 329, the French Player got to the quarter after beating Andrea Arnaboldi 6-4 6-3, Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-3 3-6 7-63 and Mats Moraing 6-2 6-3.
In the 3rd round, The French Player had a good straight sets win against Moraing (6-2 6-3). During the match Rinderknech scored 64 points vs Moraing’s 39. Arthur was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Rinderknech blasted 16 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Arthur Rinderknech was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (34/42) of his 1st serve and 80% (4/5) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Rinderknech broke Moraing 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French Player has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Rinderknech has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (27-17). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Rinderknech has a 9-7 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Rinderknech has a 3-1 win-loss record in 2020, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
The French Player didn’t play in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ilkel | Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
Tot Games | 44 | 67 |
Pts | 152-129 | 233-185 |
Total Points | 281 | 418 |
Winners | 58 | 101 |
%Winners | 38% | 43% |
Ilkel played 2 matches while Rinderknech competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Cem Ilkel conceded 1 set, while Arthur Rinderknech dropper 1 set. Ilkel has played 2 sets less than Rinderknech (5 vs 7). Therefore, Ilkel played 23 games less than Rinderknech. Ilkel scored 58 winners (38% on total points). On the other side, The French Player blasted 101 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ilkel | Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 34 |
Avg per match | 9 | 11.3 |
1st in | 79/125 | 130/183 |
%1st in | 63% | 71% |
1st pts | 58/79 | 101/130 |
%1st pts | 73% | 78% |
2nd pts | 27/46 | 31/53 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 58% |
Ilkel blasted 18 aces (9 per match). Rinderknech blasted 34 aces (11.3 per match). Ilkel won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Rinderknech won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ilkel | Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 10 |
Converted | 8/15 | 10/31 |
% Converted | 53% | 32% |
Conceded | 7 | 8 |
Saved | 3 | 4 |
% Saved | 43% | 50% |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Cem broke his opponents 8 times with 53% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Rinderknech broke his opponents 10 times with 32% conversion rate. The French Player conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Ilkel | ||||
R2 Bega |
R3 Escoffier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 26 | 44 | |
pts | 72-51 | 80-78 | 152-129 | |
Total points | 123 | 158 | 281 | |
Winners | 23 | 35 | 58 | |
%Winners | 32% | 44% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 10 | 8 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
1st in | 29/52 | 50/73 | 79/125 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 68% | 63% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 35/50 | 58/79 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 70% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 12/23 | 27/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 52% | 59% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/9 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 67% | 44% | 53% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Saved | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 60% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Rinderknech | |||||
R1 Arnaboldi |
R2 Zapata Miralles |
R3 Moraing |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-63 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 31 | 17 | 67 | |
pts | 66-49 | 103-97 | 64-39 | 233-185 | |
Total points | 115 | 200 | 103 | 418 | |
Winners | 31 | 36 | 34 | 101 | |
%Winners | 47% | 35% | 53% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 9 | 16 | 34 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
1st in | 36/44 | 52/92 | 42/47 | 130/183 | |
% 1st in | 82% | 57% | 89% | 71% | |
1st pts | 31/36 | 36/52 | 34/42 | 101/130 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 69% | 81% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 5/8 | 22/40 | 4/5 | 31/53 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 55% | 80% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 3/10 | 4/16 | 3/5 | 10/31 | |
Converted % | 30% | 25% | 60% | 32% | |
Conceded | 0 | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
Saved | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Saved % | 0% | 57% | 0% | 29% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Rennes Challenger
- James WardWard – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Tristan LamasineLamasine (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Evan FurnessFurness (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Alexey VatutinVatutin (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (0-0) – See H2H details
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (0-0) – See H2H details
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – See H2H details
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – James WardWard (0-0) – See H2H details