James Ward and Corentin Denolly will square off in the 3rd round of the the Rennes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on SAINT-GREGOIRE. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Corentin Denolly who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Corentin Denolly is the pick to win this match.
Corentin Denolly -> 1.44
James Ward -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Ward vs. Corentin Denolly
There is no head to head record between James Ward and Corentin Denolly since this will be the first time that they will square off at pro level.
James Ward
Ranked no. 313, Ward reached the 3rd round after defeating Benjamin Bonzi 3-6 7-66 7-5 and Pavel Kotov 6-3 6-75 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Brit defeated Kotov (6-3 6-75 6-3). During the match Ward scored 94 points vs Kotov’s 87. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Ward blasted 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. James Ward was extremely effective on serve to win 83% (50/60) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ward broke Kotov twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
James has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Ward has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (117-114). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ward has a 192-195 record in the last 10 years on indoor hard courts.
James has a 2-1 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
The Brit didn’t compete in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Corentin Denolly
Ranked no. 321, Corentin got to the 3rd round after beating Quentin Gueydan 6-3 6-0 and Lukas Klein 6-2 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The French Player defeated Klein (6-2 3-6 6-3). During the match Denolly scored 89 points vs Klein’s 80. Corentin was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Denolly blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Corentin Denolly lost the serve twice and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Denolly put 71% of his first serves in, winning 64% (38/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the 2nd serve. Corentin broke Klein 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Denolly has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (41-31). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Denolly has a 25-25 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Denolly has a 2-0 win-loss record in 2020, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Rennes Challenger
Denolly didn’t compete in the Rennes Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ward | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 65 | 41 |
| Pts | 213-205 | 144-116 |
| Total Points | 418 | 260 |
| Winners | 99 | 53 |
| %Winners | 46% | 37% |
Both Ward and Denolly played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. James Ward conceded 2 sets, while Corentin Denolly dropper 1 set. Ward has played 1 sets more than Denolly (6 vs 5). Therefore, Ward played 24 games more than Denolly. Ward scored 99 winners (46% on total points). On the other side, The French Player blasted 53 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ward | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 139/218 | 81/120 |
| %1st in | 64% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 99/139 | 53/81 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 42/79 | 19/39 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 49% |
Ward blasted 14 aces (7 per match). Denolly blasted 6 aces (3 per match). Ward won 71% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Denolly won 65% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ward | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 11 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 11/18 |
| % Converted | 46% | 61% |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 |
| Saved | 11 | 12 |
| % Saved | 69% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The Brit broke his opponents 6 times with 46% conversion rate. James conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Denolly broke his opponents 11 times with 61% conversion rate. The French Player conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ward | ||||
| R1 Bonzi |
R2 Kotov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-66 7-5 | 6-3 6-75 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 31 | 65 | |
| pts | 119-118 | 94-87 | 213-205 | |
| Total points | 237 | 181 | 418 | |
| Winners | 49 | 50 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 53% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 6 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 79/126 | 60/92 | 139/218 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 65% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 49/79 | 50/60 | 99/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 83% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/47 | 18/32 | 42/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 56% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/5 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 0 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11 | 0 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 31% | 0% | 16% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| Denolly | ||||
| Q3 Gueydan |
R1 Klein |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 26 | 41 | |
| pts | 55-36 | 89-80 | 144-116 | |
| Total points | 91 | 169 | 260 | |
| Winners | 15 | 38 | 53 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 43% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 22/37 | 59/83 | 81/120 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 15/22 | 38/59 | 53/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 64% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/15 | 13/24 | 19/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 54% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 4/8 | 11/18 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 50% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 14 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0 | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 14% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWLW Tennis Scores in Rennes Challenger
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Karim-Mohamed MaamounMaamoun (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (7-66 6-0) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Alessandro BegaBega (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- James WardWard – Pavel KotovKotov (6-3 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Patrik Niklas-SalminenNiklas-Salminen (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-3 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Dan AddedAdded (7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-2 0-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-6(6) 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Lukas LackoLacko (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-1) – See H2H details
- James WardWard – Corentin DenollyDenolly (0-0) – See H2H details
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – See H2H details
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – See H2H details
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – See H2H details
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – See H2H details
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (0-0) – See H2H details
