Federico Gaio and Denis Istomin will fight against each other in the 3rd round of the the Bangkok Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:30 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Istomin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Istomin is the pick to win this match.
Denis Istomin -> 1.44
Federico Gaio -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Denis Istomin
Head 2 Head
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Gaio and Denis Istomin face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Istomin (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
Federico Gaio
Ranked no. 151, the Italian got to the 3rd round after defeating Kaichi Uchida 3-6 7-65 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Uchida, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 7-5). During the match Gaio scored 97 points vs Uchida’s 89. Gaio was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Gaio overpowered his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Federico Gaio was extremely effective on serve to win 89% (34/38) of his 1st serve and 58% (28/48) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Federico was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Uchida 3 times.
Gaio has a negative record in the last 10 years having won only 37% of his matches (130-225). 1-2 on hard in 2020. . In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaio has a 143-157 record in the last 10 years on hard.
Gaio has a 1-2 win-loss record in 2020, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bangkok Challenger
Federico didn’t compete in the Bangkok Challenger in 2019.
Denis Istomin
Ranked no. 170, Denis got to the 3rd round after defeating Santiago Giraldo 6-3 7-67.
In the 2nd round, Istomin had a good straight sets win against Giraldo (6-3 7-67). During the match Istomin scored 76 points vs Giraldo’s 68. Denis was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Istomin blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Denis Istomin lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Istomin put 72% of his first serves in, winning 72% (41/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (9/22) on the 2nd serve. The Uzbek broke Giraldo 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Istomin has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (561-436). 2-1 on hard in 2020. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Istomin has a 247-245 win-loss record in the last 10 years on hard.
Istomin has a 2-1 win-loss record in 2020, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Bangkok Challenger
Istomin didn’t play in the Bangkok Challenger in 2019.
Live score
Follow the live score and result of this match as soon as it starts
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gaio | Istomin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 34 | 22 |
Pts | 97-89 | 76-68 |
Total Points | 186 | 144 |
Winners | 34 | 41 |
%Winners | 35% | 54% |
Both Gaio and Istomin played 1 matche. At the moment, Federico Gaio lost 1 set while Denis Istomin hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gaio has played 1 sets more than Istomin (3 vs 2). Therefore, Gaio played 12 games more than Istomin. The Italian scored 34 winners (35% on total points). On the other side, Denis blasted 41 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gaio | Istomin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 21 | 7 |
Avg per match | 21 | 7 |
1st in | 38/86 | 57/79 |
%1st in | 44% | 72% |
1st pts | 34/38 | 41/57 |
%1st pts | 89% | 72% |
2nd pts | 28/48 | 9/22 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 41% |
Gaio blasted 21 aces . Istomin blasted 7 aces . Gaio won 89% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Istomin won 72% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gaio | Istomin |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/5 |
% Converted | 100% | 60% |
Conceded | 5 | 8 |
Saved | 2 | 6 |
% Saved | 40% | 75% |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Gaio broke his opponent 3 times with 100% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Denis broke his opponent 3 times with 60% conversion rate. Denis conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Gaio | |||
R2 Uchida |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
pts | 97-89 | 97-89 | |
Total points | 186 | 186 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 21 | 21 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 38/86 | 38/86 | |
% 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
1st pts | 34/38 | 34/38 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 28/48 | 28/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Istomin | |||
R2 Giraldo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-67 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 76-68 | 76-68 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 57/79 | 57/79 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 9/22 | 9/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 6 | 6 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Bangkok Challenger
- Robin HaaseHaase – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Antoine HoangHoang (6-0 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (4-6 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (7-65 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Santiago GiraldoGiraldo (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Kaichi UchidaUchida (3-6 7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Go SoedaSoeda – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-6 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Martin KlizanKlizan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Jc AragoneAragone (7-65 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (7-6(5) 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (4-6 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (3-6 6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Antoine HoangHoang (6-0 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Filippo BaldiBaldi (6-1 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches
- Denis IstominIstomin – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – See H2H details
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – See H2H details
- Attila BalazsBalazs – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – See H2H details
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – See H2H details
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – See H2H details
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Go SoedaSoeda (0-0) – See H2H details
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – See H2H details
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (0-0) – See H2H details